On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems

Finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator is fundamental in convex optimization and monotone operator theory, and \emph{proximal point algorithm} (PPA) is a primary method for solving this problem. PPA converges not only globally under fairly mild conditions but also asymptotically at a fast lin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gu, Guoyong, Yang, Junfeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Gu, Guoyong
Yang, Junfeng
description Finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator is fundamental in convex optimization and monotone operator theory, and \emph{proximal point algorithm} (PPA) is a primary method for solving this problem. PPA converges not only globally under fairly mild conditions but also asymptotically at a fast linear rate provided that the underlying inverse operator is Lipschitz continuous at the origin. These nice convergence properties are preserved by a relaxed variant of PPA. Recently, a linear convergence bound was established in [M. Tao, and X. M. Yuan, J. Sci. Comput., 74 (2018), pp. 826-850] for the relaxed PPA, and it was shown that the bound is optimal when the relaxation factor $\gamma$ lies in $[1,2)$. However, for other choices of $\gamma$, the bound obtained by Tao and Yuan is suboptimal. In this paper, we establish tight linear convergence bounds for any choice of $\gamma\in(0,2)$ and make the whole picture about optimal linear convergence bounds clear. These results sharpen our understandings to the asymptotic behavior of the relaxed PPA.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1905.04537
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1905_04537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1905_04537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-a1389904b8a1ca8745e5a6551331be77450bd3141af215a26a76cb0c0d0fdac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tqwzAQRbXpoqT9gK6qH7ArRZZlL0voCwLZZG_G8igRyBojq8H9-yZuV8OFcy9zGHuSoqwarcULpMVfStkKXYpKK3PPpkPk-YycpuxHCDz4iJC4pXjBdMJokTuwmRInt4IJAyw48CnRsjYm8jFzCCdKPp9H7q7sSJEyReQ-2vA9e4o3vg84zg_szkGY8fH_btjx_e24-yz2h4-v3eu-gNqYAqRq2lZUfQPSQmMqjRpqraVSskdzzaIflKwkuK3UsK3B1LYXVgzCDWBrtWHPf7Orcjel66_pp7upd6u6-gWL0FZQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Gu, Guoyong ; Yang, Junfeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Gu, Guoyong ; Yang, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><description>Finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator is fundamental in convex optimization and monotone operator theory, and \emph{proximal point algorithm} (PPA) is a primary method for solving this problem. PPA converges not only globally under fairly mild conditions but also asymptotically at a fast linear rate provided that the underlying inverse operator is Lipschitz continuous at the origin. These nice convergence properties are preserved by a relaxed variant of PPA. Recently, a linear convergence bound was established in [M. Tao, and X. M. Yuan, J. Sci. Comput., 74 (2018), pp. 826-850] for the relaxed PPA, and it was shown that the bound is optimal when the relaxation factor $\gamma$ lies in $[1,2)$. However, for other choices of $\gamma$, the bound obtained by Tao and Yuan is suboptimal. In this paper, we establish tight linear convergence bounds for any choice of $\gamma\in(0,2)$ and make the whole picture about optimal linear convergence bounds clear. These results sharpen our understandings to the asymptotic behavior of the relaxed PPA.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.04537</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Mathematics - Optimization and Control</subject><creationdate>2019-05</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1905.04537$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.04537$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gu, Guoyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><title>On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems</title><description>Finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator is fundamental in convex optimization and monotone operator theory, and \emph{proximal point algorithm} (PPA) is a primary method for solving this problem. PPA converges not only globally under fairly mild conditions but also asymptotically at a fast linear rate provided that the underlying inverse operator is Lipschitz continuous at the origin. These nice convergence properties are preserved by a relaxed variant of PPA. Recently, a linear convergence bound was established in [M. Tao, and X. M. Yuan, J. Sci. Comput., 74 (2018), pp. 826-850] for the relaxed PPA, and it was shown that the bound is optimal when the relaxation factor $\gamma$ lies in $[1,2)$. However, for other choices of $\gamma$, the bound obtained by Tao and Yuan is suboptimal. In this paper, we establish tight linear convergence bounds for any choice of $\gamma\in(0,2)$ and make the whole picture about optimal linear convergence bounds clear. These results sharpen our understandings to the asymptotic behavior of the relaxed PPA.</description><subject>Mathematics - Optimization and Control</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tqwzAQRbXpoqT9gK6qH7ArRZZlL0voCwLZZG_G8igRyBojq8H9-yZuV8OFcy9zGHuSoqwarcULpMVfStkKXYpKK3PPpkPk-YycpuxHCDz4iJC4pXjBdMJokTuwmRInt4IJAyw48CnRsjYm8jFzCCdKPp9H7q7sSJEyReQ-2vA9e4o3vg84zg_szkGY8fH_btjx_e24-yz2h4-v3eu-gNqYAqRq2lZUfQPSQmMqjRpqraVSskdzzaIflKwkuK3UsK3B1LYXVgzCDWBrtWHPf7Orcjel66_pp7upd6u6-gWL0FZQ</recordid><startdate>20190511</startdate><enddate>20190511</enddate><creator>Gu, Guoyong</creator><creator>Yang, Junfeng</creator><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190511</creationdate><title>On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems</title><author>Gu, Guoyong ; Yang, Junfeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-a1389904b8a1ca8745e5a6551331be77450bd3141af215a26a76cb0c0d0fdac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Mathematics - Optimization and Control</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gu, Guoyong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Junfeng</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gu, Guoyong</au><au>Yang, Junfeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems</atitle><date>2019-05-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>Finding a zero of a maximal monotone operator is fundamental in convex optimization and monotone operator theory, and \emph{proximal point algorithm} (PPA) is a primary method for solving this problem. PPA converges not only globally under fairly mild conditions but also asymptotically at a fast linear rate provided that the underlying inverse operator is Lipschitz continuous at the origin. These nice convergence properties are preserved by a relaxed variant of PPA. Recently, a linear convergence bound was established in [M. Tao, and X. M. Yuan, J. Sci. Comput., 74 (2018), pp. 826-850] for the relaxed PPA, and it was shown that the bound is optimal when the relaxation factor $\gamma$ lies in $[1,2)$. However, for other choices of $\gamma$, the bound obtained by Tao and Yuan is suboptimal. In this paper, we establish tight linear convergence bounds for any choice of $\gamma\in(0,2)$ and make the whole picture about optimal linear convergence bounds clear. These results sharpen our understandings to the asymptotic behavior of the relaxed PPA.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1905.04537</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.04537
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1905_04537
source arXiv.org
subjects Mathematics - Optimization and Control
title On the optimal linear convergence factor of the relaxed proximal point algorithm for monotone inclusion problems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T11%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20optimal%20linear%20convergence%20factor%20of%20the%20relaxed%20proximal%20point%20algorithm%20for%20monotone%20inclusion%20problems&rft.au=Gu,%20Guoyong&rft.date=2019-05-11&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1905.04537&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1905_04537%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true