On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections

Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approxima...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2019-05
Hauptverfasser: Tiburzi, C, Verbiest, J P W, Shaifullah, G M, Janssen, G H, Anderson, J M, Horneffer, A, Kuensemoeller, J, Oslowski, S, Donner, J Y, Kramer, M, Kumari, A, Porayko, N K, Zucca, P, Ciardi, B, R -J Dettmar, J -M Griessmeier, Hoeft, M, Serylak, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Tiburzi, C
Verbiest, J P W
Shaifullah, G M
Janssen, G H
Anderson, J M
Horneffer, A
Kuensemoeller, J
Oslowski, S
Donner, J Y
Kramer, M
Kumari, A
Porayko, N K
Zucca, P
Ciardi, B
R -J Dettmar
J -M Griessmeier
Hoeft, M
Serylak, M
description Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approximating the electron density distribution in the Solar wind either as spherically symmetric, or with a two-phase model that describes the contributions from both high- and low-speed phases of the Solar wind. However, no dataset has previously been available to test the performance and limitations of these models over extended timescales and with sufficient sensitivity. Here we present the results of such a test with an optimal dataset of observations of pulsar J0034-0534, taken with the German stations of LOFAR. We conclude that the spherical approximation performs systematically better than the two-phase model at almost all angular distances, with a residual root-mean-square (rms) given by the two-phase model being up to 28% larger than the result obtained with the spherical approximation. Nevertheless, the spherical approximation remains insufficiently accurate in modelling the Solar-wind delay (especially within 20 degrees of angular distance from the Sun), as it leaves timing residuals with rms values that reach the equivalent of 0.3 microseconds at 1400 MHz. This is because a spherical model ignores the large daily variations in electron density observed in the Solar wind. In the short term, broadband observations or simultaneous observations at low frequencies are the most promising way forward to correct for Solar-wind induced delay variations.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1905.02989
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1905_02989</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2222314240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-e628abf2073ab010d1f4e667f2199d0934285400261469af5f89fb46ac8123b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYJ19eP2ktU8ZKKuqD7yGlscJXGxU6g_D1Ny2xmczSaQ8gNg1JoKeHepkP4LpkBWQIabS7IBDlnhRaIV2SW8xYAUM1RSj4hb6uO9p-ODtn5oe1czjR66g4h96H7oO-xtan4CV1Dd7FxbaY-Jrof2mwT7cNuZDYxJbfpQ-zyNbn0ts1u9t9Tsn56XC9eiuXq-XXxsCysRCicQm1rjzDntgYGDfPCKTX3yIxpwHCBWorxJBPKWC-9Nr4Wym40Q14jn5Lb8-zJtdqnsLPptxqdq5Pzkbg7E_sUvwaX-2obh9QdP1V4DGcCBfA_KIFY_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2222314240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Tiburzi, C ; Verbiest, J P W ; Shaifullah, G M ; Janssen, G H ; Anderson, J M ; Horneffer, A ; Kuensemoeller, J ; Oslowski, S ; Donner, J Y ; Kramer, M ; Kumari, A ; Porayko, N K ; Zucca, P ; Ciardi, B ; R -J Dettmar ; J -M Griessmeier ; Hoeft, M ; Serylak, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Tiburzi, C ; Verbiest, J P W ; Shaifullah, G M ; Janssen, G H ; Anderson, J M ; Horneffer, A ; Kuensemoeller, J ; Oslowski, S ; Donner, J Y ; Kramer, M ; Kumari, A ; Porayko, N K ; Zucca, P ; Ciardi, B ; R -J Dettmar ; J -M Griessmeier ; Hoeft, M ; Serylak, M</creatorcontrib><description>Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approximating the electron density distribution in the Solar wind either as spherically symmetric, or with a two-phase model that describes the contributions from both high- and low-speed phases of the Solar wind. However, no dataset has previously been available to test the performance and limitations of these models over extended timescales and with sufficient sensitivity. Here we present the results of such a test with an optimal dataset of observations of pulsar J0034-0534, taken with the German stations of LOFAR. We conclude that the spherical approximation performs systematically better than the two-phase model at almost all angular distances, with a residual root-mean-square (rms) given by the two-phase model being up to 28% larger than the result obtained with the spherical approximation. Nevertheless, the spherical approximation remains insufficiently accurate in modelling the Solar-wind delay (especially within 20 degrees of angular distance from the Sun), as it leaves timing residuals with rms values that reach the equivalent of 0.3 microseconds at 1400 MHz. This is because a spherical model ignores the large daily variations in electron density observed in the Solar wind. In the short term, broadband observations or simultaneous observations at low frequencies are the most promising way forward to correct for Solar-wind induced delay variations.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1905.02989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Approximation ; Broadband ; Delay ; Density distribution ; Electron density ; Gravitational waves ; LOFAR ; Low speed ; Mathematical analysis ; Physics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena ; Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ; Pulsars ; Solar wind</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2019-05</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1278$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1905.02989$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tiburzi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbiest, J P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaifullah, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horneffer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuensemoeller, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oslowski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donner, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porayko, N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucca, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciardi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R -J Dettmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J -M Griessmeier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeft, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serylak, M</creatorcontrib><title>On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approximating the electron density distribution in the Solar wind either as spherically symmetric, or with a two-phase model that describes the contributions from both high- and low-speed phases of the Solar wind. However, no dataset has previously been available to test the performance and limitations of these models over extended timescales and with sufficient sensitivity. Here we present the results of such a test with an optimal dataset of observations of pulsar J0034-0534, taken with the German stations of LOFAR. We conclude that the spherical approximation performs systematically better than the two-phase model at almost all angular distances, with a residual root-mean-square (rms) given by the two-phase model being up to 28% larger than the result obtained with the spherical approximation. Nevertheless, the spherical approximation remains insufficiently accurate in modelling the Solar-wind delay (especially within 20 degrees of angular distance from the Sun), as it leaves timing residuals with rms values that reach the equivalent of 0.3 microseconds at 1400 MHz. This is because a spherical model ignores the large daily variations in electron density observed in the Solar wind. In the short term, broadband observations or simultaneous observations at low frequencies are the most promising way forward to correct for Solar-wind induced delay variations.</description><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Broadband</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Density distribution</subject><subject>Electron density</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>LOFAR</subject><subject>Low speed</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Physics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena</subject><subject>Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</subject><subject>Pulsars</subject><subject>Solar wind</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tOwzAURC0kJKrSD2CFJdYJ19eP2ktU8ZKKuqD7yGlscJXGxU6g_D1Ny2xmczSaQ8gNg1JoKeHepkP4LpkBWQIabS7IBDlnhRaIV2SW8xYAUM1RSj4hb6uO9p-ODtn5oe1czjR66g4h96H7oO-xtan4CV1Dd7FxbaY-Jrof2mwT7cNuZDYxJbfpQ-zyNbn0ts1u9t9Tsn56XC9eiuXq-XXxsCysRCicQm1rjzDntgYGDfPCKTX3yIxpwHCBWorxJBPKWC-9Nr4Wym40Q14jn5Lb8-zJtdqnsLPptxqdq5Pzkbg7E_sUvwaX-2obh9QdP1V4DGcCBfA_KIFY_Q</recordid><startdate>20190508</startdate><enddate>20190508</enddate><creator>Tiburzi, C</creator><creator>Verbiest, J P W</creator><creator>Shaifullah, G M</creator><creator>Janssen, G H</creator><creator>Anderson, J M</creator><creator>Horneffer, A</creator><creator>Kuensemoeller, J</creator><creator>Oslowski, S</creator><creator>Donner, J Y</creator><creator>Kramer, M</creator><creator>Kumari, A</creator><creator>Porayko, N K</creator><creator>Zucca, P</creator><creator>Ciardi, B</creator><creator>R -J Dettmar</creator><creator>J -M Griessmeier</creator><creator>Hoeft, M</creator><creator>Serylak, M</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190508</creationdate><title>On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections</title><author>Tiburzi, C ; Verbiest, J P W ; Shaifullah, G M ; Janssen, G H ; Anderson, J M ; Horneffer, A ; Kuensemoeller, J ; Oslowski, S ; Donner, J Y ; Kramer, M ; Kumari, A ; Porayko, N K ; Zucca, P ; Ciardi, B ; R -J Dettmar ; J -M Griessmeier ; Hoeft, M ; Serylak, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a520-e628abf2073ab010d1f4e667f2199d0934285400261469af5f89fb46ac8123b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Broadband</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Density distribution</topic><topic>Electron density</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>LOFAR</topic><topic>Low speed</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Physics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena</topic><topic>Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics</topic><topic>Pulsars</topic><topic>Solar wind</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tiburzi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verbiest, J P W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaifullah, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Janssen, G H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horneffer, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuensemoeller, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oslowski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Donner, J Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kramer, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porayko, N K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zucca, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciardi, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>R -J Dettmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>J -M Griessmeier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoeft, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serylak, M</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tiburzi, C</au><au>Verbiest, J P W</au><au>Shaifullah, G M</au><au>Janssen, G H</au><au>Anderson, J M</au><au>Horneffer, A</au><au>Kuensemoeller, J</au><au>Oslowski, S</au><au>Donner, J Y</au><au>Kramer, M</au><au>Kumari, A</au><au>Porayko, N K</au><au>Zucca, P</au><au>Ciardi, B</au><au>R -J Dettmar</au><au>J -M Griessmeier</au><au>Hoeft, M</au><au>Serylak, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2019-05-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Dispersive delays due to the Solar wind introduce excess noise in high-precision pulsar timing experiments, and must be removed in order to achieve the accuracy needed to detect, e.g., low-frequency gravitational waves. In current pulsar timing experiments, this delay is usually removed by approximating the electron density distribution in the Solar wind either as spherically symmetric, or with a two-phase model that describes the contributions from both high- and low-speed phases of the Solar wind. However, no dataset has previously been available to test the performance and limitations of these models over extended timescales and with sufficient sensitivity. Here we present the results of such a test with an optimal dataset of observations of pulsar J0034-0534, taken with the German stations of LOFAR. We conclude that the spherical approximation performs systematically better than the two-phase model at almost all angular distances, with a residual root-mean-square (rms) given by the two-phase model being up to 28% larger than the result obtained with the spherical approximation. Nevertheless, the spherical approximation remains insufficiently accurate in modelling the Solar-wind delay (especially within 20 degrees of angular distance from the Sun), as it leaves timing residuals with rms values that reach the equivalent of 0.3 microseconds at 1400 MHz. This is because a spherical model ignores the large daily variations in electron density observed in the Solar wind. In the short term, broadband observations or simultaneous observations at low frequencies are the most promising way forward to correct for Solar-wind induced delay variations.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1905.02989</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2019-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1905_02989
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Approximation
Broadband
Delay
Density distribution
Electron density
Gravitational waves
LOFAR
Low speed
Mathematical analysis
Physics - High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena
Physics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Pulsars
Solar wind
title On the usefulness of existing Solar-wind models for pulsar timing corrections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A04%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20usefulness%20of%20existing%20Solar-wind%20models%20for%20pulsar%20timing%20corrections&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Tiburzi,%20C&rft.date=2019-05-08&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1905.02989&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2222314240%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2222314240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true