CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair

We present CFAAR, a program repair assistance technique that operates by selectively altering the outcome of suspicious predicates in order to yield expected behavior. CFAAR is applicable to defects that are repairable by negating predicates under specific conditions. CFAAR proceeds as follows: 1) i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Trad, Chadi, Assi, Rawad Abou, Masri, Wes, Zaraket, Fadi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Trad, Chadi
Assi, Rawad Abou
Masri, Wes
Zaraket, Fadi
description We present CFAAR, a program repair assistance technique that operates by selectively altering the outcome of suspicious predicates in order to yield expected behavior. CFAAR is applicable to defects that are repairable by negating predicates under specific conditions. CFAAR proceeds as follows: 1) it identifies predicates such that negating them at given instances would make the failing tests exhibit correct behavior; 2) for each candidate predicate, it uses the program state information to build a classifier that dictates when the predicate should be negated; 3) for each classifier, it leverages a Decision Tree to synthesize a patch to be presented to the developer. We evaluated our toolset using 149 defects from the IntroClass and Siemens benchmarks. CFAAR identified 91 potential candidate defects and generated plausible patches for 41 of them. Twelve of the patches are believed to be correct, whereas the rest provide repair assistance to the developer.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1808.09229
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1808_09229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808_09229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a679-3bc62fcd0909427c692f83c9acc7cd13cec4e79545c436d4e0e26e74a52cb47a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzsuKwjAUgOFsXAw6DzAr8wKtaa6Nu1DszIAgiPtyPE0hUI2kwcvbD6Ou_t3PR8hXxUpZK8VWkO7hWlY1q0tmObcfZNW0zu3XtInnnOJI2zHeqBuzT5BDPNMcqZumMGW69xcIaUFmA4yT_3x3Tg7t5tD8FNvd92_jtgVoYwtxRM0H7JllVnKD2vKhFmgB0WBfCfQovbFKKpRC99Izz7U3EhTHozQg5mT52j7F3SWFE6RH9y_vnnLxB0K_PNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Trad, Chadi ; Assi, Rawad Abou ; Masri, Wes ; Zaraket, Fadi</creator><creatorcontrib>Trad, Chadi ; Assi, Rawad Abou ; Masri, Wes ; Zaraket, Fadi</creatorcontrib><description>We present CFAAR, a program repair assistance technique that operates by selectively altering the outcome of suspicious predicates in order to yield expected behavior. CFAAR is applicable to defects that are repairable by negating predicates under specific conditions. CFAAR proceeds as follows: 1) it identifies predicates such that negating them at given instances would make the failing tests exhibit correct behavior; 2) for each candidate predicate, it uses the program state information to build a classifier that dictates when the predicate should be negated; 3) for each classifier, it leverages a Decision Tree to synthesize a patch to be presented to the developer. We evaluated our toolset using 149 defects from the IntroClass and Siemens benchmarks. CFAAR identified 91 potential candidate defects and generated plausible patches for 41 of them. Twelve of the patches are believed to be correct, whereas the rest provide repair assistance to the developer.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1808.09229</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><creationdate>2018-08</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,777,882</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09229$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1808.09229$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Trad, Chadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assi, Rawad Abou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masri, Wes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaraket, Fadi</creatorcontrib><title>CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair</title><description>We present CFAAR, a program repair assistance technique that operates by selectively altering the outcome of suspicious predicates in order to yield expected behavior. CFAAR is applicable to defects that are repairable by negating predicates under specific conditions. CFAAR proceeds as follows: 1) it identifies predicates such that negating them at given instances would make the failing tests exhibit correct behavior; 2) for each candidate predicate, it uses the program state information to build a classifier that dictates when the predicate should be negated; 3) for each classifier, it leverages a Decision Tree to synthesize a patch to be presented to the developer. We evaluated our toolset using 149 defects from the IntroClass and Siemens benchmarks. CFAAR identified 91 potential candidate defects and generated plausible patches for 41 of them. Twelve of the patches are believed to be correct, whereas the rest provide repair assistance to the developer.</description><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzsuKwjAUgOFsXAw6DzAr8wKtaa6Nu1DszIAgiPtyPE0hUI2kwcvbD6Ou_t3PR8hXxUpZK8VWkO7hWlY1q0tmObcfZNW0zu3XtInnnOJI2zHeqBuzT5BDPNMcqZumMGW69xcIaUFmA4yT_3x3Tg7t5tD8FNvd92_jtgVoYwtxRM0H7JllVnKD2vKhFmgB0WBfCfQovbFKKpRC99Izz7U3EhTHozQg5mT52j7F3SWFE6RH9y_vnnLxB0K_PNI</recordid><startdate>20180828</startdate><enddate>20180828</enddate><creator>Trad, Chadi</creator><creator>Assi, Rawad Abou</creator><creator>Masri, Wes</creator><creator>Zaraket, Fadi</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180828</creationdate><title>CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair</title><author>Trad, Chadi ; Assi, Rawad Abou ; Masri, Wes ; Zaraket, Fadi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a679-3bc62fcd0909427c692f83c9acc7cd13cec4e79545c436d4e0e26e74a52cb47a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Trad, Chadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Assi, Rawad Abou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masri, Wes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zaraket, Fadi</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Trad, Chadi</au><au>Assi, Rawad Abou</au><au>Masri, Wes</au><au>Zaraket, Fadi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair</atitle><date>2018-08-28</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>We present CFAAR, a program repair assistance technique that operates by selectively altering the outcome of suspicious predicates in order to yield expected behavior. CFAAR is applicable to defects that are repairable by negating predicates under specific conditions. CFAAR proceeds as follows: 1) it identifies predicates such that negating them at given instances would make the failing tests exhibit correct behavior; 2) for each candidate predicate, it uses the program state information to build a classifier that dictates when the predicate should be negated; 3) for each classifier, it leverages a Decision Tree to synthesize a patch to be presented to the developer. We evaluated our toolset using 149 defects from the IntroClass and Siemens benchmarks. CFAAR identified 91 potential candidate defects and generated plausible patches for 41 of them. Twelve of the patches are believed to be correct, whereas the rest provide repair assistance to the developer.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1808.09229</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1808.09229
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1808_09229
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Software Engineering
title CFAAR: Control Flow Alteration to Assist Repair
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A57%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CFAAR:%20Control%20Flow%20Alteration%20to%20Assist%20Repair&rft.au=Trad,%20Chadi&rft.date=2018-08-28&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1808.09229&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1808_09229%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true