Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?

Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, whi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein, Moazzam, Sania, Lo, Christina, Lan, Tianhan, Frroku, Elis, Kim, Heejun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein
Moazzam, Sania
Lo, Christina
Lan, Tianhan
Frroku, Elis
Kim, Heejun
description Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders' needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1807.07662
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1807_07662</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1807_07662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-68c74024eb1d5af192c979af87be41f05e3b0d0a8714106c21cb316b52bcc36e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotz0FLwzAYgOFcPMj0B3jy-wOtSdomrReRMeeg4JCBu5Uv6dcZ2JKaZsP9e3F6em8vPIzdCZ6XdVXxB4zf7pSLmuuca6XkNdu24dgD-h5WPlFEm9yJYI0jRVjHkEI6j87vwHl4p6-ji3QgnyZY7J11CZML_hE-PjGBm8AlWIbQwxDi0w27GnA_0e1_Z2zzstjMX7P2bbmaP7cZKi0zVVtdclmSEX2Fg2ikbXSDQ60NlWLgFRWG9xxrLUrBlZXCmkIoU0ljbaGomLH7v-2F1o3RHTCeu19idyEWP9-tTCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein ; Moazzam, Sania ; Lo, Christina ; Lan, Tianhan ; Frroku, Elis ; Kim, Heejun</creator><creatorcontrib>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein ; Moazzam, Sania ; Lo, Christina ; Lan, Tianhan ; Frroku, Elis ; Kim, Heejun</creatorcontrib><description>Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders' needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.07662</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><creationdate>2018-07</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1807.07662$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1807.07662$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moazzam, Sania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lan, Tianhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frroku, Elis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heejun</creatorcontrib><title>Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?</title><description>Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders' needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).</description><subject>Computer Science - Software Engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotz0FLwzAYgOFcPMj0B3jy-wOtSdomrReRMeeg4JCBu5Uv6dcZ2JKaZsP9e3F6em8vPIzdCZ6XdVXxB4zf7pSLmuuca6XkNdu24dgD-h5WPlFEm9yJYI0jRVjHkEI6j87vwHl4p6-ji3QgnyZY7J11CZML_hE-PjGBm8AlWIbQwxDi0w27GnA_0e1_Z2zzstjMX7P2bbmaP7cZKi0zVVtdclmSEX2Fg2ikbXSDQ60NlWLgFRWG9xxrLUrBlZXCmkIoU0ljbaGomLH7v-2F1o3RHTCeu19idyEWP9-tTCQ</recordid><startdate>20180719</startdate><enddate>20180719</enddate><creator>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein</creator><creator>Moazzam, Sania</creator><creator>Lo, Christina</creator><creator>Lan, Tianhan</creator><creator>Frroku, Elis</creator><creator>Kim, Heejun</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180719</creationdate><title>Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?</title><author>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein ; Moazzam, Sania ; Lo, Christina ; Lan, Tianhan ; Frroku, Elis ; Kim, Heejun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-68c74024eb1d5af192c979af87be41f05e3b0d0a8714106c21cb316b52bcc36e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Software Engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moazzam, Sania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lo, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lan, Tianhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frroku, Elis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Heejun</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abad, Zahra Shakeri Hossein</au><au>Moazzam, Sania</au><au>Lo, Christina</au><au>Lan, Tianhan</au><au>Frroku, Elis</au><au>Kim, Heejun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?</atitle><date>2018-07-19</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>Requirements Engineering is a multidisciplinary and a human-centered process, therefore, the artifacts produced from RE are always error-prone. The most significant of these errors are missing or misunderstanding requirements. Information loss in RE could result in omitted logic in the software, which will be onerous to correct at the later stages of development. In this paper, we demonstrate and investigate how interactive and Loud Paper Prototyping (LPP) can be integrated to collect stakeholders' needs and expectations than interactive prototyping or face-to-face meetings alone. To this end, we conducted a case study of (1) 31 mobile application (App) development teams who applied either of interactive or loud prototyping and (2) 19 mobile App development teams who applied only the face-to-face meetings. From this study, we found that while using Silent Paper Prototyping (SPP) rather than No Paper Prototyping (NPP) is a more efficient technique to capture Non-Functional Requirements (NFRs), User Interface (UI) requirements, and existing requirements, LPP is more applicable to manage NFRs, UI requirements, as well as adding new requirements and removing/modifying the existing requirements. We also found that among LPP and SPP, LPP is more efficient to capture and influence Functional Requirements (FRs).</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1807.07662</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1807.07662
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1807_07662
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Software Engineering
title Loud and Interactive Paper Prototyping in Requirements Elicitation: What is it Good for?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T21%3A52%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loud%20and%20Interactive%20Paper%20Prototyping%20in%20Requirements%20Elicitation:%20What%20is%20it%20Good%20for?&rft.au=Abad,%20Zahra%20Shakeri%20Hossein&rft.date=2018-07-19&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1807.07662&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1807_07662%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true