Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming

While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Doerr, Benjamin, Kötzing, Timo, Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor, Lengler, Johannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Doerr, Benjamin
Kötzing, Timo
Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor
Lengler, Johannes
description While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing down optimization. Theoretical analyses could so far not bound bloat and required explicit assumptions on the magnitude of bloat. In this paper we analyze bloat in mutation-based genetic programming for the two test functions ORDER and MAJORITY. We overcome previous assumptions on the magnitude of bloat and give matching or close-to-matching upper and lower bounds for the expected optimization time. In particular, we show that the (1+1) GP takes (i) $\Theta(T_{init} + n \log n)$ iterations with bloat control on ORDER as well as MAJORITY; and (ii) $O(T_{init} \log T_{init} + n (\log n)^3)$ and $\Omega(T_{init} + n \log n)$ (and $\Omega(T_{init} \log T_{init})$ for $n=1$) iterations without bloat control on MAJORITY.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1806.02112
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1806_02112</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1806_02112</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-158ecef37fb7525db0ea0c7cc6f54efd6fda0e1a5649852c22ee4713e98bf65d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzj1vwjAUhWEvDAj4AUxkYUxqO7m2MzaofEiRYGCPbuxrZIkklUur8u_5nM7wSkcPY3PBs8IA8A-M_-EvE4arjEsh5Jgtq-G3d6E_JdV5wEsS-mRDPV2CTQ5xOEXsunucspHH8w_N3jthx_XXcbVN6_1mt_qsU1RapgIMWfK59q0GCa7lhNxqa5WHgrxT3iEngaCK0oC0UhIVWuRUmtYrcPmELV63T2fzHUOH8do8vM3Tm98AF-o6VQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Doerr, Benjamin ; Kötzing, Timo ; Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor ; Lengler, Johannes</creator><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Benjamin ; Kötzing, Timo ; Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor ; Lengler, Johannes</creatorcontrib><description>While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing down optimization. Theoretical analyses could so far not bound bloat and required explicit assumptions on the magnitude of bloat. In this paper we analyze bloat in mutation-based genetic programming for the two test functions ORDER and MAJORITY. We overcome previous assumptions on the magnitude of bloat and give matching or close-to-matching upper and lower bounds for the expected optimization time. In particular, we show that the (1+1) GP takes (i) $\Theta(T_{init} + n \log n)$ iterations with bloat control on ORDER as well as MAJORITY; and (ii) $O(T_{init} \log T_{init} + n (\log n)^3)$ and $\Omega(T_{init} + n \log n)$ (and $\Omega(T_{init} \log T_{init})$ for $n=1$) iterations without bloat control on MAJORITY.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.02112</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms ; Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</subject><creationdate>2018-06</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02112$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.02112$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kötzing, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengler, Johannes</creatorcontrib><title>Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming</title><description>While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing down optimization. Theoretical analyses could so far not bound bloat and required explicit assumptions on the magnitude of bloat. In this paper we analyze bloat in mutation-based genetic programming for the two test functions ORDER and MAJORITY. We overcome previous assumptions on the magnitude of bloat and give matching or close-to-matching upper and lower bounds for the expected optimization time. In particular, we show that the (1+1) GP takes (i) $\Theta(T_{init} + n \log n)$ iterations with bloat control on ORDER as well as MAJORITY; and (ii) $O(T_{init} \log T_{init} + n (\log n)^3)$ and $\Omega(T_{init} + n \log n)$ (and $\Omega(T_{init} \log T_{init})$ for $n=1$) iterations without bloat control on MAJORITY.</description><subject>Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms</subject><subject>Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzj1vwjAUhWEvDAj4AUxkYUxqO7m2MzaofEiRYGCPbuxrZIkklUur8u_5nM7wSkcPY3PBs8IA8A-M_-EvE4arjEsh5Jgtq-G3d6E_JdV5wEsS-mRDPV2CTQ5xOEXsunucspHH8w_N3jthx_XXcbVN6_1mt_qsU1RapgIMWfK59q0GCa7lhNxqa5WHgrxT3iEngaCK0oC0UhIVWuRUmtYrcPmELV63T2fzHUOH8do8vM3Tm98AF-o6VQ</recordid><startdate>20180606</startdate><enddate>20180606</enddate><creator>Doerr, Benjamin</creator><creator>Kötzing, Timo</creator><creator>Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor</creator><creator>Lengler, Johannes</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180606</creationdate><title>Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming</title><author>Doerr, Benjamin ; Kötzing, Timo ; Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor ; Lengler, Johannes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-158ecef37fb7525db0ea0c7cc6f54efd6fda0e1a5649852c22ee4713e98bf65d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms</topic><topic>Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doerr, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kötzing, Timo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengler, Johannes</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doerr, Benjamin</au><au>Kötzing, Timo</au><au>Lagodzinski, J. A. Gregor</au><au>Lengler, Johannes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming</atitle><date>2018-06-06</date><risdate>2018</risdate><abstract>While many optimization problems work with a fixed number of decision variables and thus a fixed-length representation of possible solutions, genetic programming (GP) works on variable-length representations. A naturally occurring problem is that of bloat (unnecessary growth of solutions) slowing down optimization. Theoretical analyses could so far not bound bloat and required explicit assumptions on the magnitude of bloat. In this paper we analyze bloat in mutation-based genetic programming for the two test functions ORDER and MAJORITY. We overcome previous assumptions on the magnitude of bloat and give matching or close-to-matching upper and lower bounds for the expected optimization time. In particular, we show that the (1+1) GP takes (i) $\Theta(T_{init} + n \log n)$ iterations with bloat control on ORDER as well as MAJORITY; and (ii) $O(T_{init} \log T_{init} + n (\log n)^3)$ and $\Omega(T_{init} + n \log n)$ (and $\Omega(T_{init} \log T_{init})$ for $n=1$) iterations without bloat control on MAJORITY.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1806.02112</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.02112
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1806_02112
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Data Structures and Algorithms
Computer Science - Neural and Evolutionary Computing
title Bounding Bloat in Genetic Programming
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T19%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bounding%20Bloat%20in%20Genetic%20Programming&rft.au=Doerr,%20Benjamin&rft.date=2018-06-06&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1806.02112&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1806_02112%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true