A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation
In this paper, we analyze the effects of contact models on contact-implicit trajectory optimization for manipulation. We consider three different approaches: (1) a contact model that is based on complementarity constraints, (2) a smooth contact model, and our proposed method (3) a variable smooth co...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2018-07 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | arXiv.org |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Aykut Ozgun Onol Long, Philip Taskin Padir |
| description | In this paper, we analyze the effects of contact models on contact-implicit trajectory optimization for manipulation. We consider three different approaches: (1) a contact model that is based on complementarity constraints, (2) a smooth contact model, and our proposed method (3) a variable smooth contact model. We compare these models in simulation in terms of physical accuracy, quality of motions, and computation time. In each case, the optimization process is initialized by setting all torque variables to zero, namely, without a meaningful initial guess. For simulations, we consider a pushing task with varying complexity for a 7 degrees-of-freedom robot arm. Our results demonstrate that the optimization based on the proposed variable smooth contact model provides a good trade-off between the physical fidelity and quality of motions at the cost of increased computation time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1806.01425 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1806_01425</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2073252567</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-ab7cee1081e44ecc280c76d5a6c319c18eb75fe3d7d98a511c85ec8e8927150f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj0trwkAUhYdCoWL9AV11oOvYeeRmxqVIX6C4yT5cJzcwEjPpTJTaX99UXR34OOfAx9iTFPPcAohXjD_-NJdWFHMhcwV3bKK0lpnNlXpgs5T2QghVGAWgJ6xc8lU49Bhx8Cfiyw7bc_KJh2bk3YBu4JtQU5u473gZcU9uCPHMt_3gD_53XIWONyHyDXa-P7YX8MjuG2wTzW45ZeX7W7n6zNbbj6_Vcp0hKJPhzjgiKaykPCfnlBXOFDVg4bRcOGlpZ6AhXZt6YRGkdBbIWbILZSSIRk_Z8_X2olz10R8wnqt_9eqiPjZero0-hu8jpaHah2McHVOlhNEKFBRG_wFTtVyj</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2073252567</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Aykut Ozgun Onol ; Long, Philip ; Taskin Padir</creator><creatorcontrib>Aykut Ozgun Onol ; Long, Philip ; Taskin Padir</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we analyze the effects of contact models on contact-implicit trajectory optimization for manipulation. We consider three different approaches: (1) a contact model that is based on complementarity constraints, (2) a smooth contact model, and our proposed method (3) a variable smooth contact model. We compare these models in simulation in terms of physical accuracy, quality of motions, and computation time. In each case, the optimization process is initialized by setting all torque variables to zero, namely, without a meaningful initial guess. For simulations, we consider a pushing task with varying complexity for a 7 degrees-of-freedom robot arm. Our results demonstrate that the optimization based on the proposed variable smooth contact model provides a good trade-off between the physical fidelity and quality of motions at the cost of increased computation time.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1806.01425</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Computer Science - Robotics ; Computer simulation ; Computing time ; Constraint modelling ; Robot arms ; Trajectory optimization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2018-07</ispartof><rights>2018. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2018.8594284$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.01425$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aykut Ozgun Onol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin Padir</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>In this paper, we analyze the effects of contact models on contact-implicit trajectory optimization for manipulation. We consider three different approaches: (1) a contact model that is based on complementarity constraints, (2) a smooth contact model, and our proposed method (3) a variable smooth contact model. We compare these models in simulation in terms of physical accuracy, quality of motions, and computation time. In each case, the optimization process is initialized by setting all torque variables to zero, namely, without a meaningful initial guess. For simulations, we consider a pushing task with varying complexity for a 7 degrees-of-freedom robot arm. Our results demonstrate that the optimization based on the proposed variable smooth contact model provides a good trade-off between the physical fidelity and quality of motions at the cost of increased computation time.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Computer Science - Robotics</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Computing time</subject><subject>Constraint modelling</subject><subject>Robot arms</subject><subject>Trajectory optimization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj0trwkAUhYdCoWL9AV11oOvYeeRmxqVIX6C4yT5cJzcwEjPpTJTaX99UXR34OOfAx9iTFPPcAohXjD_-NJdWFHMhcwV3bKK0lpnNlXpgs5T2QghVGAWgJ6xc8lU49Bhx8Cfiyw7bc_KJh2bk3YBu4JtQU5u473gZcU9uCPHMt_3gD_53XIWONyHyDXa-P7YX8MjuG2wTzW45ZeX7W7n6zNbbj6_Vcp0hKJPhzjgiKaykPCfnlBXOFDVg4bRcOGlpZ6AhXZt6YRGkdBbIWbILZSSIRk_Z8_X2olz10R8wnqt_9eqiPjZero0-hu8jpaHah2McHVOlhNEKFBRG_wFTtVyj</recordid><startdate>20180730</startdate><enddate>20180730</enddate><creator>Aykut Ozgun Onol</creator><creator>Long, Philip</creator><creator>Taskin Padir</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180730</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation</title><author>Aykut Ozgun Onol ; Long, Philip ; Taskin Padir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527-ab7cee1081e44ecc280c76d5a6c319c18eb75fe3d7d98a511c85ec8e8927150f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Computer Science - Robotics</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Computing time</topic><topic>Constraint modelling</topic><topic>Robot arms</topic><topic>Trajectory optimization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aykut Ozgun Onol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taskin Padir</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aykut Ozgun Onol</au><au>Long, Philip</au><au>Taskin Padir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2018-07-30</date><risdate>2018</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we analyze the effects of contact models on contact-implicit trajectory optimization for manipulation. We consider three different approaches: (1) a contact model that is based on complementarity constraints, (2) a smooth contact model, and our proposed method (3) a variable smooth contact model. We compare these models in simulation in terms of physical accuracy, quality of motions, and computation time. In each case, the optimization process is initialized by setting all torque variables to zero, namely, without a meaningful initial guess. For simulations, we consider a pushing task with varying complexity for a 7 degrees-of-freedom robot arm. Our results demonstrate that the optimization based on the proposed variable smooth contact model provides a good trade-off between the physical fidelity and quality of motions at the cost of increased computation time.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1806.01425</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
| ispartof | arXiv.org, 2018-07 |
| issn | 2331-8422 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_1806_01425 |
| source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Computer Science - Robotics Computer simulation Computing time Constraint modelling Robot arms Trajectory optimization |
| title | A Comparative Analysis of Contact Models in Trajectory Optimization for Manipulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T16%3A42%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Contact%20Models%20in%20Trajectory%20Optimization%20for%20Manipulation&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Aykut%20Ozgun%20Onol&rft.date=2018-07-30&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1806.01425&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2073252567%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2073252567&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |