A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity

We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2017-05
Hauptverfasser: Lange, Jacob, O'Shaughnessy, Richard, Boyle, Michael, Juan Calderón Bustillo, Campanelli, Manuela, Chu, Tony, Clark, James A, Demos, Nicholas, Fong, Heather, Healy, James, Hemberger, Daniel, Hinder, Ian, Karan Jani, Khamesra, Bhavesh, Kidder, Lawrence E, Kumar, Prayush, Laguna, Pablo, Lousto, Carlos O, Lovelace, Geoffrey, Ossokine, Serguei, Pfeiffer, Harald, Scheel, Mark A, Shoemaker, Deirdre, Szilagyi, Bela, Teukolsky, Saul, Zlochower, Yosef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Lange, Jacob
O'Shaughnessy, Richard
Boyle, Michael
Juan Calderón Bustillo
Campanelli, Manuela
Chu, Tony
Clark, James A
Demos, Nicholas
Fong, Heather
Healy, James
Hemberger, Daniel
Hinder, Ian
Karan Jani
Khamesra, Bhavesh
Kidder, Lawrence E
Kumar, Prayush
Laguna, Pablo
Lousto, Carlos O
Lovelace, Geoffrey
Ossokine, Serguei
Pfeiffer, Harald
Scheel, Mark A
Shoemaker, Deirdre
Szilagyi, Bela
Teukolsky, Saul
Zlochower, Yosef
description We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In this work, we use only the full posterior parameter distribution for generic nonprecessing binaries, drawing inferences away from the set of NR simulations used, via interpolation of a single scalar quantity (the marginalized log-likelihood, \(\ln {\cal L}\)) evaluated by comparing data to nonprecessing binary black hole simulations. We also compare the data to generic simulations, and discuss the effectiveness of this procedure for generic sources. We specifically assess the impact of higher order modes, repeating our interpretation with both \(l\le2\) as well as \(l\le3\) harmonic modes. Using the \(l\le3\) higher modes, we gain more information from the signal and can better constrain the parameters of the gravitational wave signal. We assess and quantify several sources of systematic error that our procedure could introduce, including simulation resolution and duration; most are negligible. We show through examples that our method can recover the parameters for equal mass, zero spin; GW150914-like; and unequal mass, precessing spin sources. Our study of this new parameter estimation method demonstrates we can quantify and understand the systematic and statistical error. This method allows us to use higher order modes from numerical relativity simulations to better constrain the black hole binary parameters.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1705.09833
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1705_09833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2076993236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a526-584118e1805a5d129a569990aef721fb4c62ab7b98ff76241293b8d8ca8a64123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-AE8ueE7cP9nN5lhibYVqRQoewySd0JTE1N1tsN_eNfU0zHs_ZniPkDvO4sQoxR7B_jRDzFOmYpYZKa_IREjJI5MIcUNmzh0YY0KnQik5Ie2cvoOFDj1aunC-6cA3_Rd9Rb_vd9TvwdOnxmLl2zPN--4IFh1dWhgaP5LQ0k8YkG5Kh3YYJUd9T99OHdqmCvYHtkEO_PmWXNfQOpz9zynZPi-2-Spab5Yv-XwdgRI6Uibh3CA3TIHacZGB0lmWMcA6Fbwuk0oLKNMyM3WdapEEQpZmZyowoMMmp-T-cnasojjaEMqei79KirGSQDxciKPtv0_ofHHoTzZkcYVgafgmhdTyF6hVZNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2076993236</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Lange, Jacob ; O'Shaughnessy, Richard ; Boyle, Michael ; Juan Calderón Bustillo ; Campanelli, Manuela ; Chu, Tony ; Clark, James A ; Demos, Nicholas ; Fong, Heather ; Healy, James ; Hemberger, Daniel ; Hinder, Ian ; Karan Jani ; Khamesra, Bhavesh ; Kidder, Lawrence E ; Kumar, Prayush ; Laguna, Pablo ; Lousto, Carlos O ; Lovelace, Geoffrey ; Ossokine, Serguei ; Pfeiffer, Harald ; Scheel, Mark A ; Shoemaker, Deirdre ; Szilagyi, Bela ; Teukolsky, Saul ; Zlochower, Yosef</creator><creatorcontrib>Lange, Jacob ; O'Shaughnessy, Richard ; Boyle, Michael ; Juan Calderón Bustillo ; Campanelli, Manuela ; Chu, Tony ; Clark, James A ; Demos, Nicholas ; Fong, Heather ; Healy, James ; Hemberger, Daniel ; Hinder, Ian ; Karan Jani ; Khamesra, Bhavesh ; Kidder, Lawrence E ; Kumar, Prayush ; Laguna, Pablo ; Lousto, Carlos O ; Lovelace, Geoffrey ; Ossokine, Serguei ; Pfeiffer, Harald ; Scheel, Mark A ; Shoemaker, Deirdre ; Szilagyi, Bela ; Teukolsky, Saul ; Zlochower, Yosef</creatorcontrib><description>We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In this work, we use only the full posterior parameter distribution for generic nonprecessing binaries, drawing inferences away from the set of NR simulations used, via interpolation of a single scalar quantity (the marginalized log-likelihood, \(\ln {\cal L}\)) evaluated by comparing data to nonprecessing binary black hole simulations. We also compare the data to generic simulations, and discuss the effectiveness of this procedure for generic sources. We specifically assess the impact of higher order modes, repeating our interpretation with both \(l\le2\) as well as \(l\le3\) harmonic modes. Using the \(l\le3\) higher modes, we gain more information from the signal and can better constrain the parameters of the gravitational wave signal. We assess and quantify several sources of systematic error that our procedure could introduce, including simulation resolution and duration; most are negligible. We show through examples that our method can recover the parameters for equal mass, zero spin; GW150914-like; and unequal mass, precessing spin sources. Our study of this new parameter estimation method demonstrates we can quantify and understand the systematic and statistical error. This method allows us to use higher order modes from numerical relativity simulations to better constrain the black hole binary parameters.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1705.09833</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Coalescing ; Computer simulation ; Gravitation ; Gravitational waves ; Interpolation ; Mathematical models ; Numerical relativity ; Parameter estimation ; Physics - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ; Relativity ; Simulation ; Systematic errors</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-05</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.104041$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.09833$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lange, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Shaughnessy, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan Calderón Bustillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campanelli, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinder, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karan Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamesra, Bhavesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidder, Lawrence E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Prayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laguna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lousto, Carlos O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovelace, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossokine, Serguei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheel, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szilagyi, Bela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teukolsky, Saul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlochower, Yosef</creatorcontrib><title>A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In this work, we use only the full posterior parameter distribution for generic nonprecessing binaries, drawing inferences away from the set of NR simulations used, via interpolation of a single scalar quantity (the marginalized log-likelihood, \(\ln {\cal L}\)) evaluated by comparing data to nonprecessing binary black hole simulations. We also compare the data to generic simulations, and discuss the effectiveness of this procedure for generic sources. We specifically assess the impact of higher order modes, repeating our interpretation with both \(l\le2\) as well as \(l\le3\) harmonic modes. Using the \(l\le3\) higher modes, we gain more information from the signal and can better constrain the parameters of the gravitational wave signal. We assess and quantify several sources of systematic error that our procedure could introduce, including simulation resolution and duration; most are negligible. We show through examples that our method can recover the parameters for equal mass, zero spin; GW150914-like; and unequal mass, precessing spin sources. Our study of this new parameter estimation method demonstrates we can quantify and understand the systematic and statistical error. This method allows us to use higher order modes from numerical relativity simulations to better constrain the black hole binary parameters.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Coalescing</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Gravitation</subject><subject>Gravitational waves</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical relativity</subject><subject>Parameter estimation</subject><subject>Physics - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology</subject><subject>Relativity</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Systematic errors</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE9Lw0AQxRdBsNR-AE8ueE7cP9nN5lhibYVqRQoewySd0JTE1N1tsN_eNfU0zHs_ZniPkDvO4sQoxR7B_jRDzFOmYpYZKa_IREjJI5MIcUNmzh0YY0KnQik5Ie2cvoOFDj1aunC-6cA3_Rd9Rb_vd9TvwdOnxmLl2zPN--4IFh1dWhgaP5LQ0k8YkG5Kh3YYJUd9T99OHdqmCvYHtkEO_PmWXNfQOpz9zynZPi-2-Spab5Yv-XwdgRI6Uibh3CA3TIHacZGB0lmWMcA6Fbwuk0oLKNMyM3WdapEEQpZmZyowoMMmp-T-cnasojjaEMqei79KirGSQDxciKPtv0_ofHHoTzZkcYVgafgmhdTyF6hVZNQ</recordid><startdate>20170527</startdate><enddate>20170527</enddate><creator>Lange, Jacob</creator><creator>O'Shaughnessy, Richard</creator><creator>Boyle, Michael</creator><creator>Juan Calderón Bustillo</creator><creator>Campanelli, Manuela</creator><creator>Chu, Tony</creator><creator>Clark, James A</creator><creator>Demos, Nicholas</creator><creator>Fong, Heather</creator><creator>Healy, James</creator><creator>Hemberger, Daniel</creator><creator>Hinder, Ian</creator><creator>Karan Jani</creator><creator>Khamesra, Bhavesh</creator><creator>Kidder, Lawrence E</creator><creator>Kumar, Prayush</creator><creator>Laguna, Pablo</creator><creator>Lousto, Carlos O</creator><creator>Lovelace, Geoffrey</creator><creator>Ossokine, Serguei</creator><creator>Pfeiffer, Harald</creator><creator>Scheel, Mark A</creator><creator>Shoemaker, Deirdre</creator><creator>Szilagyi, Bela</creator><creator>Teukolsky, Saul</creator><creator>Zlochower, Yosef</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170527</creationdate><title>A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity</title><author>Lange, Jacob ; O'Shaughnessy, Richard ; Boyle, Michael ; Juan Calderón Bustillo ; Campanelli, Manuela ; Chu, Tony ; Clark, James A ; Demos, Nicholas ; Fong, Heather ; Healy, James ; Hemberger, Daniel ; Hinder, Ian ; Karan Jani ; Khamesra, Bhavesh ; Kidder, Lawrence E ; Kumar, Prayush ; Laguna, Pablo ; Lousto, Carlos O ; Lovelace, Geoffrey ; Ossokine, Serguei ; Pfeiffer, Harald ; Scheel, Mark A ; Shoemaker, Deirdre ; Szilagyi, Bela ; Teukolsky, Saul ; Zlochower, Yosef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a526-584118e1805a5d129a569990aef721fb4c62ab7b98ff76241293b8d8ca8a64123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Coalescing</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Gravitation</topic><topic>Gravitational waves</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical relativity</topic><topic>Parameter estimation</topic><topic>Physics - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology</topic><topic>Relativity</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Systematic errors</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lange, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Shaughnessy, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juan Calderón Bustillo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campanelli, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chu, Tony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, James A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demos, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hemberger, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinder, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karan Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khamesra, Bhavesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidder, Lawrence E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Prayush</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laguna, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lousto, Carlos O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lovelace, Geoffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ossokine, Serguei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pfeiffer, Harald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheel, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shoemaker, Deirdre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szilagyi, Bela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teukolsky, Saul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zlochower, Yosef</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lange, Jacob</au><au>O'Shaughnessy, Richard</au><au>Boyle, Michael</au><au>Juan Calderón Bustillo</au><au>Campanelli, Manuela</au><au>Chu, Tony</au><au>Clark, James A</au><au>Demos, Nicholas</au><au>Fong, Heather</au><au>Healy, James</au><au>Hemberger, Daniel</au><au>Hinder, Ian</au><au>Karan Jani</au><au>Khamesra, Bhavesh</au><au>Kidder, Lawrence E</au><au>Kumar, Prayush</au><au>Laguna, Pablo</au><au>Lousto, Carlos O</au><au>Lovelace, Geoffrey</au><au>Ossokine, Serguei</au><au>Pfeiffer, Harald</au><au>Scheel, Mark A</au><au>Shoemaker, Deirdre</au><au>Szilagyi, Bela</au><au>Teukolsky, Saul</au><au>Zlochower, Yosef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-05-27</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>We present and assess a Bayesian method to interpret gravitational wave signals from binary black holes. Our method directly compares gravitational wave data to numerical relativity simulations. This procedure bypasses approximations used in semi-analytical models for compact binary coalescence. In this work, we use only the full posterior parameter distribution for generic nonprecessing binaries, drawing inferences away from the set of NR simulations used, via interpolation of a single scalar quantity (the marginalized log-likelihood, \(\ln {\cal L}\)) evaluated by comparing data to nonprecessing binary black hole simulations. We also compare the data to generic simulations, and discuss the effectiveness of this procedure for generic sources. We specifically assess the impact of higher order modes, repeating our interpretation with both \(l\le2\) as well as \(l\le3\) harmonic modes. Using the \(l\le3\) higher modes, we gain more information from the signal and can better constrain the parameters of the gravitational wave signal. We assess and quantify several sources of systematic error that our procedure could introduce, including simulation resolution and duration; most are negligible. We show through examples that our method can recover the parameters for equal mass, zero spin; GW150914-like; and unequal mass, precessing spin sources. Our study of this new parameter estimation method demonstrates we can quantify and understand the systematic and statistical error. This method allows us to use higher order modes from numerical relativity simulations to better constrain the black hole binary parameters.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1705.09833</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1705_09833
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Bayesian analysis
Coalescing
Computer simulation
Gravitation
Gravitational waves
Interpolation
Mathematical models
Numerical relativity
Parameter estimation
Physics - General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Relativity
Simulation
Systematic errors
title A Parameter Estimation Method that Directly Compares Gravitational Wave Observations to Numerical Relativity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Parameter%20Estimation%20Method%20that%20Directly%20Compares%20Gravitational%20Wave%20Observations%20to%20Numerical%20Relativity&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Lange,%20Jacob&rft.date=2017-05-27&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1705.09833&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2076993236%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2076993236&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true