Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall

Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, whic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Ziegel, Johanna F, Krüger, Fabian, Jordan, Alexander, Fasciati, Fernando
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Quantitative Finance - Risk Management Statistics - Applications
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator	Ziegel, Johanna F Krüger, Fabian Jordan, Alexander Fasciati, Fernando
description	Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks (Murphy diagrams) of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.
doi_str_mv	10.48550/arxiv.1705.04537
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1705_04537</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1705_04537</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-255445d8ff2648e3943f202ccbdef5278abebe12616a93680f0a5aa295681c403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj71uwjAYAL0wVMADdMIvkNR_n-2wIRpoJSoG2KMvjg2RAomcgODtobTTbac7Qt45S5UFYB8Yb_U15YZByhRI80bmP5fYHe_0s8ZDxFM_p6s2eof9QPMrNhcc6vZM20DzW-fd4Cu6O7ZxCNg0EzJ6ovfTf47JfpXvl1_JZrv-Xi42CWpjEgGgFFQ2BKGV9TJTMggmnCsrH0AYi6UvPReaa8yktiwwBESRgbbcKSbHZPanfcUXXaxPGO_F70TxmpAPCJRBEA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Ziegel, Johanna F ; Krüger, Fabian ; Jordan, Alexander ; Fasciati, Fernando</creator><creatorcontrib>Ziegel, Johanna F ; Krüger, Fabian ; Jordan, Alexander ; Fasciati, Fernando</creatorcontrib><description>Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks (Murphy diagrams) of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1705.04537</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Quantitative Finance - Risk Management ; Statistics - Applications</subject><creationdate>2017-05</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04537$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1705.04537$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ziegel, Johanna F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasciati, Fernando</creatorcontrib><title>Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall</title><description>Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks (Murphy diagrams) of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.</description><subject>Quantitative Finance - Risk Management</subject><subject>Statistics - Applications</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj71uwjAYAL0wVMADdMIvkNR_n-2wIRpoJSoG2KMvjg2RAomcgODtobTTbac7Qt45S5UFYB8Yb_U15YZByhRI80bmP5fYHe_0s8ZDxFM_p6s2eof9QPMrNhcc6vZM20DzW-fd4Cu6O7ZxCNg0EzJ6ovfTf47JfpXvl1_JZrv-Xi42CWpjEgGgFFQ2BKGV9TJTMggmnCsrH0AYi6UvPReaa8yktiwwBESRgbbcKSbHZPanfcUXXaxPGO_F70TxmpAPCJRBEA</recordid><startdate>20170512</startdate><enddate>20170512</enddate><creator>Ziegel, Johanna F</creator><creator>Krüger, Fabian</creator><creator>Jordan, Alexander</creator><creator>Fasciati, Fernando</creator><scope>EPD</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170512</creationdate><title>Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall</title><author>Ziegel, Johanna F ; Krüger, Fabian ; Jordan, Alexander ; Fasciati, Fernando</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-255445d8ff2648e3943f202ccbdef5278abebe12616a93680f0a5aa295681c403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Quantitative Finance - Risk Management</topic><topic>Statistics - Applications</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ziegel, Johanna F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krüger, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jordan, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fasciati, Fernando</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Statistics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ziegel, Johanna F</au><au>Krüger, Fabian</au><au>Jordan, Alexander</au><au>Fasciati, Fernando</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall</atitle><date>2017-05-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Motivated by the Basel 3 regulations, recent studies have considered joint forecasts of Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall. A large family of scoring functions can be used to evaluate forecast performance in this context. However, little intuitive or empirical guidance is currently available, which renders the choice of scoring function awkward in practice. We therefore develop graphical checks (Murphy diagrams) of whether one forecast method dominates another under a relevant class of scoring functions, and propose an associated hypothesis test. We illustrate these tools with simulation examples and an empirical analysis of S&P 500 and DAX returns.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1705.04537</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier	DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1705.04537
ispartof
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_arxiv_primary_1705_04537
source	arXiv.org
subjects	Quantitative Finance - Risk Management Statistics - Applications
title	Murphy Diagrams: Forecast Evaluation of Expected Shortfall
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T10%3A13%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Murphy%20Diagrams:%20Forecast%20Evaluation%20of%20Expected%20Shortfall&rft.au=Ziegel,%20Johanna%20F&rft.date=2017-05-12&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1705.04537&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1705_04537%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true