An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter

Recent research has shown a substantial active presence of bots in online social networks (OSNs). In this paper we utilise our past work on studying bots (Stweeler) to comparatively analyse the usage and impact of bots and humans on Twitter, one of the largest OSNs in the world. We collect a large-s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Gilani, Zafar, Farahbakhsh, Reza, Tyson, Gareth, Wang, Liang, Crowcroft, Jon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Gilani, Zafar
Farahbakhsh, Reza
Tyson, Gareth
Wang, Liang
Crowcroft, Jon
description Recent research has shown a substantial active presence of bots in online social networks (OSNs). In this paper we utilise our past work on studying bots (Stweeler) to comparatively analyse the usage and impact of bots and humans on Twitter, one of the largest OSNs in the world. We collect a large-scale Twitter dataset and define various metrics based on tweet metadata. We divide and filter the dataset in four popularity groups in terms of number of followers. Using a human annotation task we assign 'bot' and 'human' ground-truth labels to the dataset, and compare the annotations against an online bot detection tool for evaluation. We then ask a series of questions to discern important behavioural bot and human characteristics using metrics within and among four popularity groups. From the comparative analysis we draw important differences as well as surprising similarities between the two entities, thus paving the way for reliable classification of automated political infiltration, advertisement campaigns, and general bot detection.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1704_01508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1704_01508</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-f3aa94cf31efe4116f55f1c221d1691a3f06aacf5c9b4d3f69c5fe43d1fc5b543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81OwzAQhH3pAbV9AE74BRK8tddNuJWqUKRKXHKPtrZXtUSdyjF_b08onEYafRrNJ8QtqNo0iOqe8lf8qGGtTK0AVXMjHjZJxlT5cCkn6U6UyZWQ40glDkkOLB-HMkpKXu7fz5RGObXdZywTtBAzprcxLP9zLrqnXbfdV4fX55ft5lCRXTcVa6LWONYQOBgAy4gMbrUCD7YF0qwskWN07dF4zbZ1OIHaAzs8otFzcfc3ez3fX3I8U_7ufyX6q4T-ARaCQeo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Gilani, Zafar ; Farahbakhsh, Reza ; Tyson, Gareth ; Wang, Liang ; Crowcroft, Jon</creator><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Zafar ; Farahbakhsh, Reza ; Tyson, Gareth ; Wang, Liang ; Crowcroft, Jon</creatorcontrib><description>Recent research has shown a substantial active presence of bots in online social networks (OSNs). In this paper we utilise our past work on studying bots (Stweeler) to comparatively analyse the usage and impact of bots and humans on Twitter, one of the largest OSNs in the world. We collect a large-scale Twitter dataset and define various metrics based on tweet metadata. We divide and filter the dataset in four popularity groups in terms of number of followers. Using a human annotation task we assign 'bot' and 'human' ground-truth labels to the dataset, and compare the annotations against an online bot detection tool for evaluation. We then ask a series of questions to discern important behavioural bot and human characteristics using metrics within and among four popularity groups. From the comparative analysis we draw important differences as well as surprising similarities between the two entities, thus paving the way for reliable classification of automated political infiltration, advertisement campaigns, and general bot detection.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</subject><creationdate>2017-04</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1704.01508$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1704.01508$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farahbakhsh, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyson, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowcroft, Jon</creatorcontrib><title>An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter</title><description>Recent research has shown a substantial active presence of bots in online social networks (OSNs). In this paper we utilise our past work on studying bots (Stweeler) to comparatively analyse the usage and impact of bots and humans on Twitter, one of the largest OSNs in the world. We collect a large-scale Twitter dataset and define various metrics based on tweet metadata. We divide and filter the dataset in four popularity groups in terms of number of followers. Using a human annotation task we assign 'bot' and 'human' ground-truth labels to the dataset, and compare the annotations against an online bot detection tool for evaluation. We then ask a series of questions to discern important behavioural bot and human characteristics using metrics within and among four popularity groups. From the comparative analysis we draw important differences as well as surprising similarities between the two entities, thus paving the way for reliable classification of automated political infiltration, advertisement campaigns, and general bot detection.</description><subject>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81OwzAQhH3pAbV9AE74BRK8tddNuJWqUKRKXHKPtrZXtUSdyjF_b08onEYafRrNJ8QtqNo0iOqe8lf8qGGtTK0AVXMjHjZJxlT5cCkn6U6UyZWQ40glDkkOLB-HMkpKXu7fz5RGObXdZywTtBAzprcxLP9zLrqnXbfdV4fX55ft5lCRXTcVa6LWONYQOBgAy4gMbrUCD7YF0qwskWN07dF4zbZ1OIHaAzs8otFzcfc3ez3fX3I8U_7ufyX6q4T-ARaCQeo</recordid><startdate>20170405</startdate><enddate>20170405</enddate><creator>Gilani, Zafar</creator><creator>Farahbakhsh, Reza</creator><creator>Tyson, Gareth</creator><creator>Wang, Liang</creator><creator>Crowcroft, Jon</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170405</creationdate><title>An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter</title><author>Gilani, Zafar ; Farahbakhsh, Reza ; Tyson, Gareth ; Wang, Liang ; Crowcroft, Jon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a678-f3aa94cf31efe4116f55f1c221d1691a3f06aacf5c9b4d3f69c5fe43d1fc5b543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gilani, Zafar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farahbakhsh, Reza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyson, Gareth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crowcroft, Jon</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gilani, Zafar</au><au>Farahbakhsh, Reza</au><au>Tyson, Gareth</au><au>Wang, Liang</au><au>Crowcroft, Jon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter</atitle><date>2017-04-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Recent research has shown a substantial active presence of bots in online social networks (OSNs). In this paper we utilise our past work on studying bots (Stweeler) to comparatively analyse the usage and impact of bots and humans on Twitter, one of the largest OSNs in the world. We collect a large-scale Twitter dataset and define various metrics based on tweet metadata. We divide and filter the dataset in four popularity groups in terms of number of followers. Using a human annotation task we assign 'bot' and 'human' ground-truth labels to the dataset, and compare the annotations against an online bot detection tool for evaluation. We then ask a series of questions to discern important behavioural bot and human characteristics using metrics within and among four popularity groups. From the comparative analysis we draw important differences as well as surprising similarities between the two entities, thus paving the way for reliable classification of automated political infiltration, advertisement campaigns, and general bot detection.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1704_01508
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Social and Information Networks
title An in-depth characterisation of Bots and Humans on Twitter
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T09%3A45%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20in-depth%20characterisation%20of%20Bots%20and%20Humans%20on%20Twitter&rft.au=Gilani,%20Zafar&rft.date=2017-04-05&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1704.01508&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1704_01508%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true