Selective Harvesting over Networks

Active search (AS) on graphs focuses on collecting certain labeled nodes (targets) given global knowledge of the network topology and its edge weights under a query budget. However, in most networks, nodes, topology and edge weights are all initially unknown. We introduce selective harvesting, a var...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Murai, Fabricio, Rennó, Diogo, Ribeiro, Bruno, Pappa, Gisele L, Towsley, Don, Gile, Krista
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Murai, Fabricio
Rennó, Diogo
Ribeiro, Bruno
Pappa, Gisele L
Towsley, Don
Gile, Krista
description Active search (AS) on graphs focuses on collecting certain labeled nodes (targets) given global knowledge of the network topology and its edge weights under a query budget. However, in most networks, nodes, topology and edge weights are all initially unknown. We introduce selective harvesting, a variant of AS where the next node to be queried must be chosen among the neighbors of the current queried node set; the available training data for deciding which node to query is restricted to the subgraph induced by the queried set (and their node attributes) and their neighbors (without any node or edge attributes). Therefore, selective harvesting is a sequential decision problem, where we must decide which node to query at each step. A classifier trained in this scenario suffers from a tunnel vision effect: without recourse to independent sampling, the urge to query promising nodes forces classifiers to gather increasingly biased training data, which we show significantly hurts the performance of AS methods and standard classifiers. We find that it is possible to collect a much larger set of targets by using multiple classifiers, not by combining their predictions as an ensemble, but switching between classifiers used at each step, as a way to ease the tunnel vision effect. We discover that switching classifiers collects more targets by (a) diversifying the training data and (b) broadening the choices of nodes that can be queried next. This highlights an exploration, exploitation, and diversification trade-off in our problem that goes beyond the exploration and exploitation duality found in classic sequential decision problems. From these observations we propose D3TS, a method based on multi-armed bandits for non-stationary stochastic processes that enforces classifier diversity, matching or exceeding the performance of competing methods on seven real network datasets in our evaluation.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1703.05082
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1703_05082</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1703_05082</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-1668473acd28f4003d0d47f09cf0783e923f376326d179e8038aed45519184523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzrsKwjAUgOEsDqI-gJPFvfUkJ7eOIt5AdNC9hOZEilfSUvXtxcv0bz8fY0MOmbRKwcTFZ9Vm3ABmoMCKLhvv6UxlU7WUrFxsqW6q6zG5tRSTLTWPWzzVfdYJ7lzT4N8eOyzmh9kq3eyW69l0kzptRMq1ttKgK72wQQKgBy9NgLwMYCxSLjCg0Si05yYnC2gdeakUz7mVSmCPjX7bL7K4x-ri4qv4YIsvFt_7tDdn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective Harvesting over Networks</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Murai, Fabricio ; Rennó, Diogo ; Ribeiro, Bruno ; Pappa, Gisele L ; Towsley, Don ; Gile, Krista</creator><creatorcontrib>Murai, Fabricio ; Rennó, Diogo ; Ribeiro, Bruno ; Pappa, Gisele L ; Towsley, Don ; Gile, Krista</creatorcontrib><description>Active search (AS) on graphs focuses on collecting certain labeled nodes (targets) given global knowledge of the network topology and its edge weights under a query budget. However, in most networks, nodes, topology and edge weights are all initially unknown. We introduce selective harvesting, a variant of AS where the next node to be queried must be chosen among the neighbors of the current queried node set; the available training data for deciding which node to query is restricted to the subgraph induced by the queried set (and their node attributes) and their neighbors (without any node or edge attributes). Therefore, selective harvesting is a sequential decision problem, where we must decide which node to query at each step. A classifier trained in this scenario suffers from a tunnel vision effect: without recourse to independent sampling, the urge to query promising nodes forces classifiers to gather increasingly biased training data, which we show significantly hurts the performance of AS methods and standard classifiers. We find that it is possible to collect a much larger set of targets by using multiple classifiers, not by combining their predictions as an ensemble, but switching between classifiers used at each step, as a way to ease the tunnel vision effect. We discover that switching classifiers collects more targets by (a) diversifying the training data and (b) broadening the choices of nodes that can be queried next. This highlights an exploration, exploitation, and diversification trade-off in our problem that goes beyond the exploration and exploitation duality found in classic sequential decision problems. From these observations we propose D3TS, a method based on multi-armed bandits for non-stationary stochastic processes that enforces classifier diversity, matching or exceeding the performance of competing methods on seven real network datasets in our evaluation.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.05082</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Learning ; Computer Science - Social and Information Networks ; Statistics - Machine Learning</subject><creationdate>2017-03</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05082$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05082$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murai, Fabricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennó, Diogo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappa, Gisele L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towsley, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gile, Krista</creatorcontrib><title>Selective Harvesting over Networks</title><description>Active search (AS) on graphs focuses on collecting certain labeled nodes (targets) given global knowledge of the network topology and its edge weights under a query budget. However, in most networks, nodes, topology and edge weights are all initially unknown. We introduce selective harvesting, a variant of AS where the next node to be queried must be chosen among the neighbors of the current queried node set; the available training data for deciding which node to query is restricted to the subgraph induced by the queried set (and their node attributes) and their neighbors (without any node or edge attributes). Therefore, selective harvesting is a sequential decision problem, where we must decide which node to query at each step. A classifier trained in this scenario suffers from a tunnel vision effect: without recourse to independent sampling, the urge to query promising nodes forces classifiers to gather increasingly biased training data, which we show significantly hurts the performance of AS methods and standard classifiers. We find that it is possible to collect a much larger set of targets by using multiple classifiers, not by combining their predictions as an ensemble, but switching between classifiers used at each step, as a way to ease the tunnel vision effect. We discover that switching classifiers collects more targets by (a) diversifying the training data and (b) broadening the choices of nodes that can be queried next. This highlights an exploration, exploitation, and diversification trade-off in our problem that goes beyond the exploration and exploitation duality found in classic sequential decision problems. From these observations we propose D3TS, a method based on multi-armed bandits for non-stationary stochastic processes that enforces classifier diversity, matching or exceeding the performance of competing methods on seven real network datasets in our evaluation.</description><subject>Computer Science - Learning</subject><subject>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</subject><subject>Statistics - Machine Learning</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzrsKwjAUgOEsDqI-gJPFvfUkJ7eOIt5AdNC9hOZEilfSUvXtxcv0bz8fY0MOmbRKwcTFZ9Vm3ABmoMCKLhvv6UxlU7WUrFxsqW6q6zG5tRSTLTWPWzzVfdYJ7lzT4N8eOyzmh9kq3eyW69l0kzptRMq1ttKgK72wQQKgBy9NgLwMYCxSLjCg0Si05yYnC2gdeakUz7mVSmCPjX7bL7K4x-ri4qv4YIsvFt_7tDdn</recordid><startdate>20170315</startdate><enddate>20170315</enddate><creator>Murai, Fabricio</creator><creator>Rennó, Diogo</creator><creator>Ribeiro, Bruno</creator><creator>Pappa, Gisele L</creator><creator>Towsley, Don</creator><creator>Gile, Krista</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>EPD</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170315</creationdate><title>Selective Harvesting over Networks</title><author>Murai, Fabricio ; Rennó, Diogo ; Ribeiro, Bruno ; Pappa, Gisele L ; Towsley, Don ; Gile, Krista</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a672-1668473acd28f4003d0d47f09cf0783e923f376326d179e8038aed45519184523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Learning</topic><topic>Computer Science - Social and Information Networks</topic><topic>Statistics - Machine Learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murai, Fabricio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rennó, Diogo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Bruno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pappa, Gisele L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Towsley, Don</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gile, Krista</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv Statistics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murai, Fabricio</au><au>Rennó, Diogo</au><au>Ribeiro, Bruno</au><au>Pappa, Gisele L</au><au>Towsley, Don</au><au>Gile, Krista</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective Harvesting over Networks</atitle><date>2017-03-15</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>Active search (AS) on graphs focuses on collecting certain labeled nodes (targets) given global knowledge of the network topology and its edge weights under a query budget. However, in most networks, nodes, topology and edge weights are all initially unknown. We introduce selective harvesting, a variant of AS where the next node to be queried must be chosen among the neighbors of the current queried node set; the available training data for deciding which node to query is restricted to the subgraph induced by the queried set (and their node attributes) and their neighbors (without any node or edge attributes). Therefore, selective harvesting is a sequential decision problem, where we must decide which node to query at each step. A classifier trained in this scenario suffers from a tunnel vision effect: without recourse to independent sampling, the urge to query promising nodes forces classifiers to gather increasingly biased training data, which we show significantly hurts the performance of AS methods and standard classifiers. We find that it is possible to collect a much larger set of targets by using multiple classifiers, not by combining their predictions as an ensemble, but switching between classifiers used at each step, as a way to ease the tunnel vision effect. We discover that switching classifiers collects more targets by (a) diversifying the training data and (b) broadening the choices of nodes that can be queried next. This highlights an exploration, exploitation, and diversification trade-off in our problem that goes beyond the exploration and exploitation duality found in classic sequential decision problems. From these observations we propose D3TS, a method based on multi-armed bandits for non-stationary stochastic processes that enforces classifier diversity, matching or exceeding the performance of competing methods on seven real network datasets in our evaluation.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1703.05082</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1703.05082
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1703_05082
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Learning
Computer Science - Social and Information Networks
Statistics - Machine Learning
title Selective Harvesting over Networks
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A42%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20Harvesting%20over%20Networks&rft.au=Murai,%20Fabricio&rft.date=2017-03-15&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1703.05082&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1703_05082%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true