Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes

We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Van Wonterghem, J, Alloum, A, Boutros, J. J, Moeneclaey, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Van Wonterghem, J
Alloum, A
Boutros, J. J
Moeneclaey, M
description We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic Ordered Statistics Decoder on the Gaussian channel. As such we compare codes and not decoders. The word error rate versus the channel parameter is found for LDPC, Reed-Muller, Polar, and BCH codes at length 256 bits. BCH codes outperform other codes in absence of cyclic redundancy check. Under joint decoding, the concatenation of a cyclic redundancy check makes all codes perform very close to optimal lower bounds.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1609.07907
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1609_07907</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1609_07907</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-74c686290f49793e05eeb82cf6f49a28eb12c1b16dd83cd1635ee66d3b099d323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj81KxDAUhbNxIaMP4Mq-QGp-2ptkMQsp4w8UFJx9SZObmcK0GW6L6NtbR1cHDh-H8zF2J0VZ2boWD56-hs9SgnClME6Ya7Z9R0qZRj8FLJo8nj0Nc56KnIqPY6aFtzgdlmOxI8rEm0yEYRmmw8pGnG_YVfKnGW__c8P2T7t988Lbt-fX5rHlHozhpgpgQTmRKmecRlEj9laFBGvhlcVeqiB7CTFaHaIEvQIAUffCuaiV3rD7v9nL_-5Mw-jpu_v16C4e-gcb9EKT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Van Wonterghem, J ; Alloum, A ; Boutros, J. J ; Moeneclaey, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Van Wonterghem, J ; Alloum, A ; Boutros, J. J ; Moeneclaey, M</creatorcontrib><description>We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic Ordered Statistics Decoder on the Gaussian channel. As such we compare codes and not decoders. The word error rate versus the channel parameter is found for LDPC, Reed-Muller, Polar, and BCH codes at length 256 bits. BCH codes outperform other codes in absence of cyclic redundancy check. Under joint decoding, the concatenation of a cyclic redundancy check makes all codes perform very close to optimal lower bounds.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1609.07907</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Computer Science - Information Theory ; Mathematics - Information Theory</subject><creationdate>2016-09</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1609.07907$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.07907$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Van Wonterghem, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alloum, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeneclaey, M</creatorcontrib><title>Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes</title><description>We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic Ordered Statistics Decoder on the Gaussian channel. As such we compare codes and not decoders. The word error rate versus the channel parameter is found for LDPC, Reed-Muller, Polar, and BCH codes at length 256 bits. BCH codes outperform other codes in absence of cyclic redundancy check. Under joint decoding, the concatenation of a cyclic redundancy check makes all codes perform very close to optimal lower bounds.</description><subject>Computer Science - Information Theory</subject><subject>Mathematics - Information Theory</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj81KxDAUhbNxIaMP4Mq-QGp-2ptkMQsp4w8UFJx9SZObmcK0GW6L6NtbR1cHDh-H8zF2J0VZ2boWD56-hs9SgnClME6Ya7Z9R0qZRj8FLJo8nj0Nc56KnIqPY6aFtzgdlmOxI8rEm0yEYRmmw8pGnG_YVfKnGW__c8P2T7t988Lbt-fX5rHlHozhpgpgQTmRKmecRlEj9laFBGvhlcVeqiB7CTFaHaIEvQIAUffCuaiV3rD7v9nL_-5Mw-jpu_v16C4e-gcb9EKT</recordid><startdate>20160926</startdate><enddate>20160926</enddate><creator>Van Wonterghem, J</creator><creator>Alloum, A</creator><creator>Boutros, J. J</creator><creator>Moeneclaey, M</creator><scope>AKY</scope><scope>AKZ</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160926</creationdate><title>Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes</title><author>Van Wonterghem, J ; Alloum, A ; Boutros, J. J ; Moeneclaey, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a677-74c686290f49793e05eeb82cf6f49a28eb12c1b16dd83cd1635ee66d3b099d323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Computer Science - Information Theory</topic><topic>Mathematics - Information Theory</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Van Wonterghem, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alloum, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boutros, J. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moeneclaey, M</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv Computer Science</collection><collection>arXiv Mathematics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Van Wonterghem, J</au><au>Alloum, A</au><au>Boutros, J. J</au><au>Moeneclaey, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes</atitle><date>2016-09-26</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>We compare the performance of short-length linear binary codes on the binary erasure channel and the binary-input Gaussian channel. We use a universal decoder that can decode any linear binary block code: Gaussian-elimination based Maximum-Likelihood decoder on the erasure channel and probabilistic Ordered Statistics Decoder on the Gaussian channel. As such we compare codes and not decoders. The word error rate versus the channel parameter is found for LDPC, Reed-Muller, Polar, and BCH codes at length 256 bits. BCH codes outperform other codes in absence of cyclic redundancy check. Under joint decoding, the concatenation of a cyclic redundancy check makes all codes perform very close to optimal lower bounds.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1609.07907</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1609.07907
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1609_07907
source arXiv.org
subjects Computer Science - Information Theory
Mathematics - Information Theory
title Performance Comparison of Short-Length Error-Correcting Codes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A54%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20Comparison%20of%20Short-Length%20Error-Correcting%20Codes&rft.au=Van%20Wonterghem,%20J&rft.date=2016-09-26&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1609.07907&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1609_07907%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true