Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes

Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2017-05
Hauptverfasser: Phillips, Nick E, Manning, Cerys, Papalopulu, Nancy, Rattray, Magnus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Phillips, Nick E
Manning, Cerys
Papalopulu, Nancy
Rattray, Magnus
description Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a {\it Hes1} promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1608.06476
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1608_06476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2076045451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-d72b857804b169e692fd49cb08b131ab3b2d730e330e4129687c7c4072817823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdBsNT-AE8ueE6c_d4cpWgtFDzoPWw2m7plm9RMUuy_N209DHOY5x0eXkIeGOTSKgXPrv-Nx5xpsDloafQNmXEhWGYl53dkgbgDAK4NV0rMSL2uQzvE5hTbLcWh898Oh-hphz6m5IbYtUhjS3G6p5D5kBJN8Rho3LvtOTPEfaAY-hiQjmeKrtyIGF1LD33nA2LAe3LbuIRh8b_n5PPt9Wv5nm0-VuvlyyZzirOsNryyyliQFdNF0AVvaln4CmzFBHOVqHhtBAQxjWS80NZ44yUYbpmxXMzJ4_XrpYHy0E-K_ak8N1FempiIpysxmf2MAYdy1419OymVHIwGqaRi4g80AGGS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2076045451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes</title><source>Freely Accessible Journals</source><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Phillips, Nick E ; Manning, Cerys ; Papalopulu, Nancy ; Rattray, Magnus</creator><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nick E ; Manning, Cerys ; Papalopulu, Nancy ; Rattray, Magnus</creatorcontrib><description>Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a {\it Hes1} promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1608.06476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Biological activity ; Classification ; Computer simulation ; Data analysis ; Gaussian process ; Gene expression ; Imaging ; Oscillations ; Oscillators ; Population (statistical) ; Quantitative Biology - Molecular Networks ; Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods ; Randomness ; Regression analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Time series ; Variations</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2017-05</ispartof><rights>2017. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1608.06476$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005479$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nick E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Cerys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalopulu, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattray, Magnus</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a {\it Hes1} promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.</description><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Gaussian process</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Oscillations</subject><subject>Oscillators</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Quantitative Biology - Molecular Networks</subject><subject>Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods</subject><subject>Randomness</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>Variations</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE1Lw0AQhhdBsNT-AE8ueE6c_d4cpWgtFDzoPWw2m7plm9RMUuy_N209DHOY5x0eXkIeGOTSKgXPrv-Nx5xpsDloafQNmXEhWGYl53dkgbgDAK4NV0rMSL2uQzvE5hTbLcWh898Oh-hphz6m5IbYtUhjS3G6p5D5kBJN8Rho3LvtOTPEfaAY-hiQjmeKrtyIGF1LD33nA2LAe3LbuIRh8b_n5PPt9Wv5nm0-VuvlyyZzirOsNryyyliQFdNF0AVvaln4CmzFBHOVqHhtBAQxjWS80NZ44yUYbpmxXMzJ4_XrpYHy0E-K_ak8N1FempiIpysxmf2MAYdy1419OymVHIwGqaRi4g80AGGS</recordid><startdate>20170525</startdate><enddate>20170525</enddate><creator>Phillips, Nick E</creator><creator>Manning, Cerys</creator><creator>Papalopulu, Nancy</creator><creator>Rattray, Magnus</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>ALC</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170525</creationdate><title>Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes</title><author>Phillips, Nick E ; Manning, Cerys ; Papalopulu, Nancy ; Rattray, Magnus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a521-d72b857804b169e692fd49cb08b131ab3b2d730e330e4129687c7c4072817823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Gaussian process</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Oscillations</topic><topic>Oscillators</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Quantitative Biology - Molecular Networks</topic><topic>Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods</topic><topic>Randomness</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>Variations</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Phillips, Nick E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Cerys</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Papalopulu, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattray, Magnus</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>arXiv Quantitative Biology</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Phillips, Nick E</au><au>Manning, Cerys</au><au>Papalopulu, Nancy</au><au>Rattray, Magnus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2017-05-25</date><risdate>2017</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Multiple biological processes are driven by oscillatory gene expression at different time scales. Pulsatile dynamics are thought to be widespread, and single-cell live imaging of gene expression has lead to a surge of dynamic, possibly oscillatory, data for different gene networks. However, the regulation of gene expression at the level of an individual cell involves reactions between finite numbers of molecules, and this can result in inherent randomness in expression dynamics, which blurs the boundaries between aperiodic fluctuations and noisy oscillators. Thus, there is an acute need for an objective statistical method for classifying whether an experimentally derived noisy time series is periodic. Here we present a new data analysis method that combines mechanistic stochastic modelling with the powerful methods of non-parametric regression with Gaussian processes. Our method can distinguish oscillatory gene expression from random fluctuations of non-oscillatory expression in single-cell time series, despite peak-to-peak variability in period and amplitude of single-cell oscillations. We show that our method outperforms the Lomb-Scargle periodogram in successfully classifying cells as oscillatory or non-oscillatory in data simulated from a simple genetic oscillator model and in experimental data. Analysis of bioluminescent live cell imaging shows a significantly greater number of oscillatory cells when luciferase is driven by a {\it Hes1} promoter (10/19), which has previously been reported to oscillate, than the constitutive MoMuLV 5' LTR (MMLV) promoter (0/25). The method can be applied to data from any gene network to both quantify the proportion of oscillating cells within a population and to measure the period and quality of oscillations. It is publicly available as a MATLAB package.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1608.06476</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2017-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1608_06476
source Freely Accessible Journals; arXiv.org
subjects Biological activity
Classification
Computer simulation
Data analysis
Gaussian process
Gene expression
Imaging
Oscillations
Oscillators
Population (statistical)
Quantitative Biology - Molecular Networks
Quantitative Biology - Quantitative Methods
Randomness
Regression analysis
Statistical analysis
Time series
Variations
title Identifying stochastic oscillations in single-cell live imaging time series using Gaussian processes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T21%3A05%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20stochastic%20oscillations%20in%20single-cell%20live%20imaging%20time%20series%20using%20Gaussian%20processes&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Phillips,%20Nick%20E&rft.date=2017-05-25&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1608.06476&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2076045451%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2076045451&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true