Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations

With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:arXiv.org 2016-05
Hauptverfasser: Christiansen, Jessie L, Clarke, Bruce D, Burke, Christopher J, Jenkins, Jon M, Bryson, Stephen T, Coughlin, Jeffrey L, Mullally, Fergal, Thompson, Susan E, Twicken, Joseph D, Batalha, Natalie M, Haas, Michael R, Catanzarite, Joseph, Campbell, Jennifer R, AKM Kamal Uddin, Zamudio, Khadeejah, Smith, Jeffrey C, Henze, Christopher E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title arXiv.org
container_volume
creator Christiansen, Jessie L
Clarke, Bruce D
Burke, Christopher J
Jenkins, Jon M
Bryson, Stephen T
Coughlin, Jeffrey L
Mullally, Fergal
Thompson, Susan E
Twicken, Joseph D
Batalha, Natalie M
Haas, Michael R
Catanzarite, Joseph
Campbell, Jennifer R
AKM Kamal Uddin
Zamudio, Khadeejah
Smith, Jeffrey C
Henze, Christopher E
description With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (>40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline. We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1605.05729
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1605_05729</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2080573068</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a528-7caa745f0ba8cfcaf82b81f11ab643bf5960702d78f61b781b1fd96633bdfad13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtu2zAQRYUABRqk-YCuOkC2lcqHKNHLwn1EaIIkrvfCSBo6DGRSJSk3-a1-YRU7q7kYnHsXJ8s-claUWin2BcOzPRS8Yqpgqhars-xcSMlzXQrxPruM8YkxJqpaKCXPs3-3hHEO1u1gG9BFm-C33TkcYUO9P1B4AesgPRL8ommkAPd2otE6KqBpmgLWfr-8EzmKEbw5kg88f-A1fNuIEu5HdJRgjW6wAyZaUsLR72b6DH9teoRmP_mQ0L0yB8IUwfgAd30_h0CuJ9icWmM_j5isd_FD9s7gGOny7V5k2x_ft-vr_ObuZ7P-epOjEjqve8S6VIZ1qHvTo9Gi09xwjl1Vys6oVcVqJoZam4p3teYdN8OqqqTsBoMDlxfZp9PsUWg7BbvH8NK-im2PYhfi6kRMwf-ZKab2yc9hcRdbwfTCSFZp-R-uIXzt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2080573068</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Christiansen, Jessie L ; Clarke, Bruce D ; Burke, Christopher J ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Coughlin, Jeffrey L ; Mullally, Fergal ; Thompson, Susan E ; Twicken, Joseph D ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Haas, Michael R ; Catanzarite, Joseph ; Campbell, Jennifer R ; AKM Kamal Uddin ; Zamudio, Khadeejah ; Smith, Jeffrey C ; Henze, Christopher E</creator><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Jessie L ; Clarke, Bruce D ; Burke, Christopher J ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Coughlin, Jeffrey L ; Mullally, Fergal ; Thompson, Susan E ; Twicken, Joseph D ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Haas, Michael R ; Catanzarite, Joseph ; Campbell, Jennifer R ; AKM Kamal Uddin ; Zamudio, Khadeejah ; Smith, Jeffrey C ; Henze, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><description>With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (&gt;40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline. We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1605.05729</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Dependence ; Extrasolar planets ; Focal plane ; Mathematical analysis ; Parameter sensitivity ; Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics ; Pipelines ; Recovery ; Sensitivity ; Signal reconstruction ; Signal strength ; Transit</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2016-05</ispartof><rights>2016. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,784,885,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1605.05729$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.3847/0004-637X/828/2/99$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Jessie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Bruce D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Jon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coughlin, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullally, Fergal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twicken, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalha, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catanzarite, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Jennifer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKM Kamal Uddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamudio, Khadeejah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henze, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><title>Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (&gt;40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline. We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.</description><subject>Dependence</subject><subject>Extrasolar planets</subject><subject>Focal plane</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Parameter sensitivity</subject><subject>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</subject><subject>Pipelines</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Signal reconstruction</subject><subject>Signal strength</subject><subject>Transit</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotkMtu2zAQRYUABRqk-YCuOkC2lcqHKNHLwn1EaIIkrvfCSBo6DGRSJSk3-a1-YRU7q7kYnHsXJ8s-claUWin2BcOzPRS8Yqpgqhars-xcSMlzXQrxPruM8YkxJqpaKCXPs3-3hHEO1u1gG9BFm-C33TkcYUO9P1B4AesgPRL8ommkAPd2otE6KqBpmgLWfr-8EzmKEbw5kg88f-A1fNuIEu5HdJRgjW6wAyZaUsLR72b6DH9teoRmP_mQ0L0yB8IUwfgAd30_h0CuJ9icWmM_j5isd_FD9s7gGOny7V5k2x_ft-vr_ObuZ7P-epOjEjqve8S6VIZ1qHvTo9Gi09xwjl1Vys6oVcVqJoZam4p3teYdN8OqqqTsBoMDlxfZp9PsUWg7BbvH8NK-im2PYhfi6kRMwf-ZKab2yc9hcRdbwfTCSFZp-R-uIXzt</recordid><startdate>20160518</startdate><enddate>20160518</enddate><creator>Christiansen, Jessie L</creator><creator>Clarke, Bruce D</creator><creator>Burke, Christopher J</creator><creator>Jenkins, Jon M</creator><creator>Bryson, Stephen T</creator><creator>Coughlin, Jeffrey L</creator><creator>Mullally, Fergal</creator><creator>Thompson, Susan E</creator><creator>Twicken, Joseph D</creator><creator>Batalha, Natalie M</creator><creator>Haas, Michael R</creator><creator>Catanzarite, Joseph</creator><creator>Campbell, Jennifer R</creator><creator>AKM Kamal Uddin</creator><creator>Zamudio, Khadeejah</creator><creator>Smith, Jeffrey C</creator><creator>Henze, Christopher E</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160518</creationdate><title>Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations</title><author>Christiansen, Jessie L ; Clarke, Bruce D ; Burke, Christopher J ; Jenkins, Jon M ; Bryson, Stephen T ; Coughlin, Jeffrey L ; Mullally, Fergal ; Thompson, Susan E ; Twicken, Joseph D ; Batalha, Natalie M ; Haas, Michael R ; Catanzarite, Joseph ; Campbell, Jennifer R ; AKM Kamal Uddin ; Zamudio, Khadeejah ; Smith, Jeffrey C ; Henze, Christopher E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a528-7caa745f0ba8cfcaf82b81f11ab643bf5960702d78f61b781b1fd96633bdfad13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Dependence</topic><topic>Extrasolar planets</topic><topic>Focal plane</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Parameter sensitivity</topic><topic>Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics</topic><topic>Pipelines</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Signal reconstruction</topic><topic>Signal strength</topic><topic>Transit</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Jessie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clarke, Bruce D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, Christopher J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Jon M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bryson, Stephen T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coughlin, Jeffrey L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullally, Fergal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Twicken, Joseph D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batalha, Natalie M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haas, Michael R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Catanzarite, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campbell, Jennifer R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AKM Kamal Uddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zamudio, Khadeejah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Jeffrey C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henze, Christopher E</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Christiansen, Jessie L</au><au>Clarke, Bruce D</au><au>Burke, Christopher J</au><au>Jenkins, Jon M</au><au>Bryson, Stephen T</au><au>Coughlin, Jeffrey L</au><au>Mullally, Fergal</au><au>Thompson, Susan E</au><au>Twicken, Joseph D</au><au>Batalha, Natalie M</au><au>Haas, Michael R</au><au>Catanzarite, Joseph</au><au>Campbell, Jennifer R</au><au>AKM Kamal Uddin</au><au>Zamudio, Khadeejah</au><au>Smith, Jeffrey C</au><au>Henze, Christopher E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2016-05-18</date><risdate>2016</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>With each new version of the Kepler pipeline and resulting planet candidate catalogue, an updated measurement of the underlying planet population can only be recovered with an corresponding measurement of the Kepler pipeline detection efficiency. Here, we present measurements of the sensitivity of the pipeline (version 9.2) used to generate the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog (Coughlin et al. 2016). We measure this by injecting simulated transiting planets into the pixel-level data of 159,013 targets across the entire Kepler focal plane, and examining the recovery rate. Unlike previous versions of the Kepler pipeline, we find a strong period dependence in the measured detection efficiency, with longer (&gt;40 day) periods having a significantly lower detectability than shorter periods, introduced in part by an incorrectly implemented veto. Consequently, the sensitivity of the 9.2 pipeline cannot be cast as a simple one-dimensional function of the signal strength of the candidate planet signal as was possible for previous versions of the pipeline. We report on the implications for occurrence rate calculations based on the Q1-Q17 DR24 planet candidate catalog and offer important caveats and recommendations for performing such calculations. As before, we make available the entire table of injected planet parameters and whether they were recovered by the pipeline, enabling readers to derive the pipeline detection sensitivity in the planet and/or stellar parameter space of their choice.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1605.05729</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2331-8422
ispartof arXiv.org, 2016-05
issn 2331-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1605_05729
source arXiv.org; Free E- Journals
subjects Dependence
Extrasolar planets
Focal plane
Mathematical analysis
Parameter sensitivity
Physics - Earth and Planetary Astrophysics
Pipelines
Recovery
Sensitivity
Signal reconstruction
Signal strength
Transit
title Measuring Transit Signal Recovery in the Kepler Pipeline. III. Completeness of the Q1-Q17 DR24 Planet Candidate Catalogue, with Important Caveats for Occurrence Rate Calculations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A40%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Measuring%20Transit%20Signal%20Recovery%20in%20the%20Kepler%20Pipeline.%20III.%20Completeness%20of%20the%20Q1-Q17%20DR24%20Planet%20Candidate%20Catalogue,%20with%20Important%20Caveats%20for%20Occurrence%20Rate%20Calculations&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Christiansen,%20Jessie%20L&rft.date=2016-05-18&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1605.05729&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2080573068%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2080573068&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true