Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification
Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is an application of Bayesian inference to the problems of model selection, combined estimation and prediction that produces a straightforward model choice criteria and less risky predictions. However, the application of BMA is not always straightforward, leading to di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | arXiv.org 2015-09 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Fragoso, Tiago M Francisco Louzada Neto |
description | Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is an application of Bayesian inference to the problems of model selection, combined estimation and prediction that produces a straightforward model choice criteria and less risky predictions. However, the application of BMA is not always straightforward, leading to diverse assumptions and situational choices on its different aspects. Despite the widespread application of BMA in the literature, there were not many accounts of these differences and trends besides a few landmark revisions in the late 1990s and early 2000s, therefore not taking into account any advancements made in the last 15 years. In this work, we present an account of these developments through a careful content analysis of 587 articles in BMA published between 1996 and 2014. We also develop a conceptual classification scheme to better describe this vast literature, understand its trends and future directions and provide guidance for the researcher interested in both the application and development of the methodology. The results of the classification scheme and content review are then used to discuss the present and future of the BMA literature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.48550/arxiv.1509.08864 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_arxiv</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1509_08864</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2076443005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-3c1000e236b241bd53abbf34ac5e3524b55bed82364f6b56ebb72bc334e1a5d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tOwzAQRS0kJKrSD2CFJdYpjseTBHal4iUqsek-GjuTylUexU4L_XtCy-ou7tHVPULcpGpuCkR1T-HHH-Ypqoe5KorMXIiJBkiTwmh9JWYxbpVSOss1IkzExxMdOXrqZNtX3Eg6cKCN7zaPciHjMQ7c0uCdDHzw_C2pq6TrO8e7YU-NdA3F6GvvRqbvrsVlTU3k2X9Oxfrleb18S1afr-_LxSoh1JiAS8cDrCGz2qS2QiBrazDkkAG1sYiWq2LsTZ1ZzNjaXFsHYDglrACm4vY8ezItd8G3FI7ln3F5Mh6JuzOxC_3XnuNQbvt96MZPpVZ5ZgwohfALsTpZXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2076443005</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification</title><source>arXiv.org</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Fragoso, Tiago M ; Francisco Louzada Neto</creator><creatorcontrib>Fragoso, Tiago M ; Francisco Louzada Neto</creatorcontrib><description>Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is an application of Bayesian inference to the problems of model selection, combined estimation and prediction that produces a straightforward model choice criteria and less risky predictions. However, the application of BMA is not always straightforward, leading to diverse assumptions and situational choices on its different aspects. Despite the widespread application of BMA in the literature, there were not many accounts of these differences and trends besides a few landmark revisions in the late 1990s and early 2000s, therefore not taking into account any advancements made in the last 15 years. In this work, we present an account of these developments through a careful content analysis of 587 articles in BMA published between 1996 and 2014. We also develop a conceptual classification scheme to better describe this vast literature, understand its trends and future directions and provide guidance for the researcher interested in both the application and development of the methodology. The results of the classification scheme and content review are then used to discuss the present and future of the BMA literature.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1509.08864</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Bayesian analysis ; Classification ; Classification schemes ; Content analysis ; Mathematical models ; Statistical inference ; Statistics - Applications ; Statistics - Methodology ; Trends</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2015-09</ispartof><rights>2015. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,776,780,881,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12243$$DView published paper (Access to full text may be restricted)$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1509.08864$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fragoso, Tiago M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco Louzada Neto</creatorcontrib><title>Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is an application of Bayesian inference to the problems of model selection, combined estimation and prediction that produces a straightforward model choice criteria and less risky predictions. However, the application of BMA is not always straightforward, leading to diverse assumptions and situational choices on its different aspects. Despite the widespread application of BMA in the literature, there were not many accounts of these differences and trends besides a few landmark revisions in the late 1990s and early 2000s, therefore not taking into account any advancements made in the last 15 years. In this work, we present an account of these developments through a careful content analysis of 587 articles in BMA published between 1996 and 2014. We also develop a conceptual classification scheme to better describe this vast literature, understand its trends and future directions and provide guidance for the researcher interested in both the application and development of the methodology. The results of the classification scheme and content review are then used to discuss the present and future of the BMA literature.</description><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification schemes</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Statistical inference</subject><subject>Statistics - Applications</subject><subject>Statistics - Methodology</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tOwzAQRS0kJKrSD2CFJdYpjseTBHal4iUqsek-GjuTylUexU4L_XtCy-ou7tHVPULcpGpuCkR1T-HHH-Ypqoe5KorMXIiJBkiTwmh9JWYxbpVSOss1IkzExxMdOXrqZNtX3Eg6cKCN7zaPciHjMQ7c0uCdDHzw_C2pq6TrO8e7YU-NdA3F6GvvRqbvrsVlTU3k2X9Oxfrleb18S1afr-_LxSoh1JiAS8cDrCGz2qS2QiBrazDkkAG1sYiWq2LsTZ1ZzNjaXFsHYDglrACm4vY8ezItd8G3FI7ln3F5Mh6JuzOxC_3XnuNQbvt96MZPpVZ5ZgwohfALsTpZXw</recordid><startdate>20150929</startdate><enddate>20150929</enddate><creator>Fragoso, Tiago M</creator><creator>Francisco Louzada Neto</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>EPD</scope><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150929</creationdate><title>Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification</title><author>Fragoso, Tiago M ; Francisco Louzada Neto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a525-3c1000e236b241bd53abbf34ac5e3524b55bed82364f6b56ebb72bc334e1a5d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification schemes</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Statistical inference</topic><topic>Statistics - Applications</topic><topic>Statistics - Methodology</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fragoso, Tiago M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco Louzada Neto</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>arXiv Statistics</collection><collection>arXiv.org</collection><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fragoso, Tiago M</au><au>Francisco Louzada Neto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2015-09-29</date><risdate>2015</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) is an application of Bayesian inference to the problems of model selection, combined estimation and prediction that produces a straightforward model choice criteria and less risky predictions. However, the application of BMA is not always straightforward, leading to diverse assumptions and situational choices on its different aspects. Despite the widespread application of BMA in the literature, there were not many accounts of these differences and trends besides a few landmark revisions in the late 1990s and early 2000s, therefore not taking into account any advancements made in the last 15 years. In this work, we present an account of these developments through a careful content analysis of 587 articles in BMA published between 1996 and 2014. We also develop a conceptual classification scheme to better describe this vast literature, understand its trends and future directions and provide guidance for the researcher interested in both the application and development of the methodology. The results of the classification scheme and content review are then used to discuss the present and future of the BMA literature.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1509.08864</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2015-09 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_arxiv_primary_1509_08864 |
source | arXiv.org; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Bayesian analysis Classification Classification schemes Content analysis Mathematical models Statistical inference Statistics - Applications Statistics - Methodology Trends |
title | Bayesian model averaging: A systematic review and conceptual classification |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T20%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_arxiv&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bayesian%20model%20averaging:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20conceptual%20classification&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Fragoso,%20Tiago%20M&rft.date=2015-09-29&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1509.08864&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_arxiv%3E2076443005%3C/proquest_arxiv%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2076443005&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |