US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate

According to theoretical models of valuing risky corporate securities, risk of default is primary component in overall yield spread. However, sizable empirical literature considers it otherwise by giving more importance to non-default risk factors. Current study empirically attempts to provide relat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed, Kebewar, Mazen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed
Kebewar, Mazen
description According to theoretical models of valuing risky corporate securities, risk of default is primary component in overall yield spread. However, sizable empirical literature considers it otherwise by giving more importance to non-default risk factors. Current study empirically attempts to provide relative solution to this conundrum by presuming that problem lies in the subjective empirical treatment of default risk. By using post-hoc estimator approach of Lubotsky & Wittenberg (2006), we construct an efficient indicator for risk of default, by using sample of 252 US non-financial corporate data (2000-2010). On average, our results validate that almost 48% of change in yield spread is explained by default risk especially in recent financial crisis period (2007-2009). Hence, our results relatively suggest that potential problem lies in the ad-hoc measurement methods used in existing empirical literature.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1303.3391
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1303_3391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1303_3391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a651-b31bdd209d6864c35aab61b085c5334101e81c4f0e07e01547cfe72a26431f553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzk9Lw0AQBfC9eJDq3ZPsF0icyexsUm81-A8KHloPnsJsdhaC0YRtFf32turp8eDx-BlzgVC6hhmuJH8NnyUSUEm0xFPjnze2nfI8ZdmrvZneo30ZdIx2M2eVaK_tykZN8jHubR52r4cSDsszc5Jk3On5fy7M9u522z4U66f7x3a1LsQzFoEwxFjBMvrGu55YJHgM0HDPRA4BtcHeJVCoFZBd3SetK6m8I0zMtDCXf7e_7m7Ow5vk7-7o745--gFpgj1l</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed ; Kebewar, Mazen</creator><creatorcontrib>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed ; Kebewar, Mazen</creatorcontrib><description>According to theoretical models of valuing risky corporate securities, risk of default is primary component in overall yield spread. However, sizable empirical literature considers it otherwise by giving more importance to non-default risk factors. Current study empirically attempts to provide relative solution to this conundrum by presuming that problem lies in the subjective empirical treatment of default risk. By using post-hoc estimator approach of Lubotsky &amp; Wittenberg (2006), we construct an efficient indicator for risk of default, by using sample of 252 US non-financial corporate data (2000-2010). On average, our results validate that almost 48% of change in yield spread is explained by default risk especially in recent financial crisis period (2007-2009). Hence, our results relatively suggest that potential problem lies in the ad-hoc measurement methods used in existing empirical literature.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1303.3391</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities ; Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance</subject><creationdate>2013-03</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3391$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1303.3391$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebewar, Mazen</creatorcontrib><title>US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate</title><description>According to theoretical models of valuing risky corporate securities, risk of default is primary component in overall yield spread. However, sizable empirical literature considers it otherwise by giving more importance to non-default risk factors. Current study empirically attempts to provide relative solution to this conundrum by presuming that problem lies in the subjective empirical treatment of default risk. By using post-hoc estimator approach of Lubotsky &amp; Wittenberg (2006), we construct an efficient indicator for risk of default, by using sample of 252 US non-financial corporate data (2000-2010). On average, our results validate that almost 48% of change in yield spread is explained by default risk especially in recent financial crisis period (2007-2009). Hence, our results relatively suggest that potential problem lies in the ad-hoc measurement methods used in existing empirical literature.</description><subject>Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities</subject><subject>Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNotzk9Lw0AQBfC9eJDq3ZPsF0icyexsUm81-A8KHloPnsJsdhaC0YRtFf32turp8eDx-BlzgVC6hhmuJH8NnyUSUEm0xFPjnze2nfI8ZdmrvZneo30ZdIx2M2eVaK_tykZN8jHubR52r4cSDsszc5Jk3On5fy7M9u522z4U66f7x3a1LsQzFoEwxFjBMvrGu55YJHgM0HDPRA4BtcHeJVCoFZBd3SetK6m8I0zMtDCXf7e_7m7Ow5vk7-7o745--gFpgj1l</recordid><startdate>20130314</startdate><enddate>20130314</enddate><creator>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed</creator><creator>Kebewar, Mazen</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130314</creationdate><title>US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate</title><author>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed ; Kebewar, Mazen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a651-b31bdd209d6864c35aab61b085c5334101e81c4f0e07e01547cfe72a26431f553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities</topic><topic>Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kebewar, Mazen</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shah, Syed Muhammad Noaman Ahmed</au><au>Kebewar, Mazen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate</atitle><date>2013-03-14</date><risdate>2013</risdate><abstract>According to theoretical models of valuing risky corporate securities, risk of default is primary component in overall yield spread. However, sizable empirical literature considers it otherwise by giving more importance to non-default risk factors. Current study empirically attempts to provide relative solution to this conundrum by presuming that problem lies in the subjective empirical treatment of default risk. By using post-hoc estimator approach of Lubotsky &amp; Wittenberg (2006), we construct an efficient indicator for risk of default, by using sample of 252 US non-financial corporate data (2000-2010). On average, our results validate that almost 48% of change in yield spread is explained by default risk especially in recent financial crisis period (2007-2009). Hence, our results relatively suggest that potential problem lies in the ad-hoc measurement methods used in existing empirical literature.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1303.3391</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1303.3391
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1303_3391
source arXiv.org
subjects Quantitative Finance - Pricing of Securities
Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance
title US Corporate Bond Yield Spread : A default risk debate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A13%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=US%20Corporate%20Bond%20Yield%20Spread%20:%20A%20default%20risk%20debate&rft.au=Shah,%20Syed%20Muhammad%20Noaman%20Ahmed&rft.date=2013-03-14&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1303.3391&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1303_3391%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true