A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy

A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy

From the point of view of X-ray astronomers, galaxy clusters are usually divided into two classes: "cool core"(CC) and "non-cool core" (NCC) objects. The origin of this dichotomy has been subject of debate in recent years, between "evolutionary" models (where clusters c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Rossetti, M, Cavalleri, B. M, Molendi, S, Gastaldello, F, Ghizzardi, S, Eckert, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Rossetti, M
Cavalleri, B. M
Molendi, S
Gastaldello, F
Ghizzardi, S
Eckert, D
description From the point of view of X-ray astronomers, galaxy clusters are usually divided into two classes: "cool core"(CC) and "non-cool core" (NCC) objects. The origin of this dichotomy has been subject of debate in recent years, between "evolutionary" models (where clusters can evolve from CC to NCC, mainly through mergers) and "primordial" models (where the state of the cluster is fixed "ab initio" by early mergers or pre-heating). We found that in a representative sample (clusters in the GMRT Radio halo survey with available X-ray data), none of the objects hosting a giant radio halo can be classified as a cool core. This result suggests that the main mechanisms which can produce the ingredients to start a large scale synchrotron emission (most likely mergers) are the same that can destroy CC and therefore strongly supports "evolutionary" models of the CC-NCC dichotomy.
doi_str_mv 10.48550/arxiv.1101.4183
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>arxiv_GOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_arxiv_primary_1101_4183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1101_4183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a653-a8bd7094a0d8ef67e93b8fb200a0ac2c07925480fa2c111b4a77540c774ce8993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNj70KwjAYRbM4iLo7SV4g9UuTmARcRPwDwcW9fE1TWrBNiUX07f0dXO6FOxzuIWTKIZFGKZhjvNe3hHPgieRGDMlyRSMWdaDYdTGgq2gfaF956kK4vCJ6yhhtQ_s3FLWrQh-ax5gMSrxc_eTXI3Lebs7rPTuedof16shwoQRDkxcarEQojC8X2luRmzJPARDQpQ60TZU0UGLqOOe5RK2VBKe1dN5YK0Zk9sV-3mddrBuMj-xtkb0txBOAW0BT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy</title><source>arXiv.org</source><creator>Rossetti, M ; Cavalleri, B. M ; Molendi, S ; Gastaldello, F ; Ghizzardi, S ; Eckert, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, M ; Cavalleri, B. M ; Molendi, S ; Gastaldello, F ; Ghizzardi, S ; Eckert, D</creatorcontrib><description>From the point of view of X-ray astronomers, galaxy clusters are usually divided into two classes: "cool core"(CC) and "non-cool core" (NCC) objects. The origin of this dichotomy has been subject of debate in recent years, between "evolutionary" models (where clusters can evolve from CC to NCC, mainly through mergers) and "primordial" models (where the state of the cluster is fixed "ab initio" by early mergers or pre-heating). We found that in a representative sample (clusters in the GMRT Radio halo survey with available X-ray data), none of the objects hosting a giant radio halo can be classified as a cool core. This result suggests that the main mechanisms which can produce the ingredients to start a large scale synchrotron emission (most likely mergers) are the same that can destroy CC and therefore strongly supports "evolutionary" models of the CC-NCC dichotomy.</description><identifier>DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1101.4183</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics</subject><creationdate>2011-01</creationdate><rights>http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>228,230,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1101.4183$$EView_record_in_Cornell_University$$FView_record_in_$$GCornell_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1101.4183$$DView paper in arXiv$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalleri, B. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molendi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastaldello, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizzardi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, D</creatorcontrib><title>A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy</title><description>From the point of view of X-ray astronomers, galaxy clusters are usually divided into two classes: "cool core"(CC) and "non-cool core" (NCC) objects. The origin of this dichotomy has been subject of debate in recent years, between "evolutionary" models (where clusters can evolve from CC to NCC, mainly through mergers) and "primordial" models (where the state of the cluster is fixed "ab initio" by early mergers or pre-heating). We found that in a representative sample (clusters in the GMRT Radio halo survey with available X-ray data), none of the objects hosting a giant radio halo can be classified as a cool core. This result suggests that the main mechanisms which can produce the ingredients to start a large scale synchrotron emission (most likely mergers) are the same that can destroy CC and therefore strongly supports "evolutionary" models of the CC-NCC dichotomy.</description><subject>Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GOX</sourceid><recordid>eNpNj70KwjAYRbM4iLo7SV4g9UuTmARcRPwDwcW9fE1TWrBNiUX07f0dXO6FOxzuIWTKIZFGKZhjvNe3hHPgieRGDMlyRSMWdaDYdTGgq2gfaF956kK4vCJ6yhhtQ_s3FLWrQh-ax5gMSrxc_eTXI3Lebs7rPTuedof16shwoQRDkxcarEQojC8X2luRmzJPARDQpQ60TZU0UGLqOOe5RK2VBKe1dN5YK0Zk9sV-3mddrBuMj-xtkb0txBOAW0BT</recordid><startdate>20110121</startdate><enddate>20110121</enddate><creator>Rossetti, M</creator><creator>Cavalleri, B. M</creator><creator>Molendi, S</creator><creator>Gastaldello, F</creator><creator>Ghizzardi, S</creator><creator>Eckert, D</creator><scope>GOX</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20110121</creationdate><title>A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy</title><author>Rossetti, M ; Cavalleri, B. M ; Molendi, S ; Gastaldello, F ; Ghizzardi, S ; Eckert, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a653-a8bd7094a0d8ef67e93b8fb200a0ac2c07925480fa2c111b4a77540c774ce8993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rossetti, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalleri, B. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molendi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gastaldello, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghizzardi, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckert, D</creatorcontrib><collection>arXiv.org</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rossetti, M</au><au>Cavalleri, B. M</au><au>Molendi, S</au><au>Gastaldello, F</au><au>Ghizzardi, S</au><au>Eckert, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy</atitle><date>2011-01-21</date><risdate>2011</risdate><abstract>From the point of view of X-ray astronomers, galaxy clusters are usually divided into two classes: "cool core"(CC) and "non-cool core" (NCC) objects. The origin of this dichotomy has been subject of debate in recent years, between "evolutionary" models (where clusters can evolve from CC to NCC, mainly through mergers) and "primordial" models (where the state of the cluster is fixed "ab initio" by early mergers or pre-heating). We found that in a representative sample (clusters in the GMRT Radio halo survey with available X-ray data), none of the objects hosting a giant radio halo can be classified as a cool core. This result suggests that the main mechanisms which can produce the ingredients to start a large scale synchrotron emission (most likely mergers) are the same that can destroy CC and therefore strongly supports "evolutionary" models of the CC-NCC dichotomy.</abstract><doi>10.48550/arxiv.1101.4183</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1101.4183
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_arxiv_primary_1101_4183
source arXiv.org
subjects Physics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
title A radio approach to the cool core -- non cool core dichotomy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A20%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-arxiv_GOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20radio%20approach%20to%20the%20cool%20core%20--%20non%20cool%20core%20dichotomy&rft.au=Rossetti,%20M&rft.date=2011-01-21&rft_id=info:doi/10.48550/arxiv.1101.4183&rft_dat=%3Carxiv_GOX%3E1101_4183%3C/arxiv_GOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true