Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments
Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelas...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics control, and dynamics, 2000-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1094-1099 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1099 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 1094 |
| container_title | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics |
| container_volume | 23 |
| creator | Bartels, Robert E Schuster, David M |
| description | Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelastic control simulation codes. An overview will be presented of the two Navier-Stokes aeroelastic codes currently being used in an analysis of that data. A collection of results obtained by the two methods will be compared with the BACT experimental data for a wing with a statically deflected spoiler and statically and dynamically deflected aileron. Both methods employ structured computational fluid dynamics flow solvers and continuous surface modeling for the computation of complex moving control surface geometry. Motivation for this work is the development of an integrated computational aeroelasticity and active control simulation capability for the transonic flight regime and validation of that capability using the BACT wing data. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2514/2.4660 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_2_4660_pdf_fulltext</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2313793472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a369t-f7974810435c243347226f6739fb35aa91a2452a9ede6824c730e509deb4ef553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1P3DAQhq2qSGxp-Q2WKiEuobbHjpMjrKAg0XLo9lbJGrzjbiAbB9vLx79vVlQFtT3NYR4978zL2L4UR8pI_Ukd6boWb9hMGoAKmka_ZTNhQVZGtGKXvcv5RggJtbQz9mMe1yOmLseBx8AXD5F_xfuOUvWtxFvK_AuVVVxm_tCVFT-hwa_WmG75sS_dPfF5HEqKPV-QXw2xjz-f-OnjSKlb01Dye7YTsM_04ffcY9_PThfz8-ry6vPF_PiyQqjbUgXbWt1IocF4pQG0VaoOtYU2XINBbCUqbRS2tKS6UdpbEDT9sqRrTcEY2GMHz94xxbsN5eLWXfbU9zhQ3GSnrNLSSDGBH_8Cb-ImDdNtToEE226zX3Q-xZwTBTdOD2F6clK4bcVOuW3Fr3SYPfYh4eC7_IduYCr9FYUd4kvgP67D_1HPWzcugwubvi_0WOAXLbGSIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2313793472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bartels, Robert E ; Schuster, David M</creator><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Robert E ; Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><description>Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelastic control simulation codes. An overview will be presented of the two Navier-Stokes aeroelastic codes currently being used in an analysis of that data. A collection of results obtained by the two methods will be compared with the BACT experimental data for a wing with a statically deflected spoiler and statically and dynamically deflected aileron. Both methods employ structured computational fluid dynamics flow solvers and continuous surface modeling for the computation of complex moving control surface geometry. Motivation for this work is the development of an integrated computational aeroelasticity and active control simulation capability for the transonic flight regime and validation of that capability using the BACT wing data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0731-5090</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3884</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/2.4660</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JGCODS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Active control ; Algorithms ; Applied sciences ; Codes ; Computer modeling and simulation ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Computers in experimental physics ; Control methods ; Control theory. Systems ; Copyright ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fluid dynamics ; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy ; Methods ; Miscellaneous ; Modelling and identification ; Physics ; Reynolds number</subject><ispartof>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2000-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1094-1099</ispartof><rights>2001 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nov/Dec 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a369t-f7974810435c243347226f6739fb35aa91a2452a9ede6824c730e509deb4ef553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a369t-f7974810435c243347226f6739fb35aa91a2452a9ede6824c730e509deb4ef553</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=837310$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments</title><title>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</title><description>Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelastic control simulation codes. An overview will be presented of the two Navier-Stokes aeroelastic codes currently being used in an analysis of that data. A collection of results obtained by the two methods will be compared with the BACT experimental data for a wing with a statically deflected spoiler and statically and dynamically deflected aileron. Both methods employ structured computational fluid dynamics flow solvers and continuous surface modeling for the computation of complex moving control surface geometry. Motivation for this work is the development of an integrated computational aeroelasticity and active control simulation capability for the transonic flight regime and validation of that capability using the BACT wing data.</description><subject>Active control</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Codes</subject><subject>Computer modeling and simulation</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Computers in experimental physics</subject><subject>Control methods</subject><subject>Control theory. Systems</subject><subject>Copyright</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Miscellaneous</subject><subject>Modelling and identification</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><issn>0731-5090</issn><issn>1533-3884</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkE1P3DAQhq2qSGxp-Q2WKiEuobbHjpMjrKAg0XLo9lbJGrzjbiAbB9vLx79vVlQFtT3NYR4978zL2L4UR8pI_Ukd6boWb9hMGoAKmka_ZTNhQVZGtGKXvcv5RggJtbQz9mMe1yOmLseBx8AXD5F_xfuOUvWtxFvK_AuVVVxm_tCVFT-hwa_WmG75sS_dPfF5HEqKPV-QXw2xjz-f-OnjSKlb01Dye7YTsM_04ffcY9_PThfz8-ry6vPF_PiyQqjbUgXbWt1IocF4pQG0VaoOtYU2XINBbCUqbRS2tKS6UdpbEDT9sqRrTcEY2GMHz94xxbsN5eLWXfbU9zhQ3GSnrNLSSDGBH_8Cb-ImDdNtToEE226zX3Q-xZwTBTdOD2F6clK4bcVOuW3Fr3SYPfYh4eC7_IduYCr9FYUd4kvgP67D_1HPWzcugwubvi_0WOAXLbGSIQ</recordid><startdate>20001101</startdate><enddate>20001101</enddate><creator>Bartels, Robert E</creator><creator>Schuster, David M</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001101</creationdate><title>Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments</title><author>Bartels, Robert E ; Schuster, David M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a369t-f7974810435c243347226f6739fb35aa91a2452a9ede6824c730e509deb4ef553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Active control</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Codes</topic><topic>Computer modeling and simulation</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Computers in experimental physics</topic><topic>Control methods</topic><topic>Control theory. Systems</topic><topic>Copyright</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Miscellaneous</topic><topic>Modelling and identification</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bartels, Robert E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, David M</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bartels, Robert E</au><au>Schuster, David M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics</jtitle><date>2000-11-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1094</spage><epage>1099</epage><pages>1094-1099</pages><issn>0731-5090</issn><eissn>1533-3884</eissn><coden>JGCODS</coden><abstract>Two commonly used three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes codes are applied to select test cases from an experimental data set on a model known as the Benchmark Active Control Technology (BACT) wing. The BACT test provides data for the validation of aerodynamic, aeroelastic, and active aeroelastic control simulation codes. An overview will be presented of the two Navier-Stokes aeroelastic codes currently being used in an analysis of that data. A collection of results obtained by the two methods will be compared with the BACT experimental data for a wing with a statically deflected spoiler and statically and dynamically deflected aileron. Both methods employ structured computational fluid dynamics flow solvers and continuous surface modeling for the computation of complex moving control surface geometry. Motivation for this work is the development of an integrated computational aeroelasticity and active control simulation capability for the transonic flight regime and validation of that capability using the BACT wing data.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/2.4660</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0731-5090 |
| ispartof | Journal of guidance, control, and dynamics, 2000-11, Vol.23 (6), p.1094-1099 |
| issn | 0731-5090 1533-3884 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_aiaa_journals_2_4660_pdf_fulltext |
| source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Active control Algorithms Applied sciences Codes Computer modeling and simulation Computer science control theory systems Computers in experimental physics Control methods Control theory. Systems Copyright Exact sciences and technology Fluid dynamics Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Methods Miscellaneous Modelling and identification Physics Reynolds number |
| title | Comparison of Two Navier-Stokes Methods with Benchmark Active Control Technology Experiments |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T16%3A32%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Two%20Navier-Stokes%20Methods%20with%20Benchmark%20Active%20Control%20Technology%20Experiments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20guidance,%20control,%20and%20dynamics&rft.au=Bartels,%20Robert%20E&rft.date=2000-11-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1094&rft.epage=1099&rft.pages=1094-1099&rft.issn=0731-5090&rft.eissn=1533-3884&rft.coden=JGCODS&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/2.4660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E2313793472%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2313793472&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |