Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering

Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applicat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of spacecraft and rockets 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186
Hauptverfasser: Kaufman, Harold R, Robinson, Raymond S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 2
container_start_page 180
container_title Journal of spacecraft and rockets
container_volume 21
creator Kaufman, Harold R
Robinson, Raymond S
description Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/3.8631
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_3_8631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>745741966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9DQFBvaTu9zYnkVI_oOBFz8tkM9GUNIm7G9F_b0KFgoqnmeF9eJgZQk4ZnXHF5JWYzbVge2TClBCpNpncJxNKOU-lVvSQHIWwppTpuc4m5HpZo4u-ckl89X2I6JMOfdn6DTQOk6FJWp9XMfFQhap5SaApkiHD_h39MB-TgxLqgCffdUqeb5dPi_t09Xj3sLhZpSD1PKZS5aAkNUoidUCRoxAFFNI4RG0QsgJLZ1gmATRnkOW5puiMRlpkqLgSU3Kx9Xa-fesxRLupgsO6HlZp-2CNVEayTOuBPP-X5JLLARuVZz_Addv7ZrjCcqaZoVwKutM534bgsbSdrzbgPy2jdvy3FXb8904HFcBO9Yu6_IvaprYrSlv2dR3xI4ovkfOK7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161702430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><description>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/3.8631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>chemical variables control ; energy conservation ; Orbital maneuvers ; propulsion ; spacecraft</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Mar/Apr 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</description><subject>chemical variables control</subject><subject>energy conservation</subject><subject>Orbital maneuvers</subject><subject>propulsion</subject><subject>spacecraft</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9DQFBvaTu9zYnkVI_oOBFz8tkM9GUNIm7G9F_b0KFgoqnmeF9eJgZQk4ZnXHF5JWYzbVge2TClBCpNpncJxNKOU-lVvSQHIWwppTpuc4m5HpZo4u-ckl89X2I6JMOfdn6DTQOk6FJWp9XMfFQhap5SaApkiHD_h39MB-TgxLqgCffdUqeb5dPi_t09Xj3sLhZpSD1PKZS5aAkNUoidUCRoxAFFNI4RG0QsgJLZ1gmATRnkOW5puiMRlpkqLgSU3Kx9Xa-fesxRLupgsO6HlZp-2CNVEayTOuBPP-X5JLLARuVZz_Addv7ZrjCcqaZoVwKutM534bgsbSdrzbgPy2jdvy3FXb8904HFcBO9Yu6_IvaprYrSlv2dR3xI4ovkfOK7Q</recordid><startdate>19840101</startdate><enddate>19840101</enddate><creator>Kaufman, Harold R</creator><creator>Robinson, Raymond S</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840101</creationdate><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><author>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>chemical variables control</topic><topic>energy conservation</topic><topic>Orbital maneuvers</topic><topic>propulsion</topic><topic>spacecraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaufman, Harold R</au><au>Robinson, Raymond S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>1984-01-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>180-186</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/3.8631</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4650
ispartof Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186
issn 0022-4650
1533-6794
language eng
recordid cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_3_8631
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects chemical variables control
energy conservation
Orbital maneuvers
propulsion
spacecraft
title Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A07%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20thruster%20performance%20for%20orbit%20raising%20and%20maneuvering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=Kaufman,%20Harold%20R&rft.date=1984-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=180-186&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/3.8631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E745741966%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161702430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true