Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering
Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applicat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of spacecraft and rockets 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | Journal of spacecraft and rockets |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Kaufman, Harold R Robinson, Raymond S |
description | Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/3.8631 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_3_8631</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>745741966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9DQFBvaTu9zYnkVI_oOBFz8tkM9GUNIm7G9F_b0KFgoqnmeF9eJgZQk4ZnXHF5JWYzbVge2TClBCpNpncJxNKOU-lVvSQHIWwppTpuc4m5HpZo4u-ckl89X2I6JMOfdn6DTQOk6FJWp9XMfFQhap5SaApkiHD_h39MB-TgxLqgCffdUqeb5dPi_t09Xj3sLhZpSD1PKZS5aAkNUoidUCRoxAFFNI4RG0QsgJLZ1gmATRnkOW5puiMRlpkqLgSU3Kx9Xa-fesxRLupgsO6HlZp-2CNVEayTOuBPP-X5JLLARuVZz_Addv7ZrjCcqaZoVwKutM534bgsbSdrzbgPy2jdvy3FXb8904HFcBO9Yu6_IvaprYrSlv2dR3xI4ovkfOK7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2161702430</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><description>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4650</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-6794</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/3.8631</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>chemical variables control ; energy conservation ; Orbital maneuvers ; propulsion ; spacecraft</subject><ispartof>Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Mar/Apr 1984</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><title>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</title><description>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</description><subject>chemical variables control</subject><subject>energy conservation</subject><subject>Orbital maneuvers</subject><subject>propulsion</subject><subject>spacecraft</subject><issn>0022-4650</issn><issn>1533-6794</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRsFb9DQFBvaTu9zYnkVI_oOBFz8tkM9GUNIm7G9F_b0KFgoqnmeF9eJgZQk4ZnXHF5JWYzbVge2TClBCpNpncJxNKOU-lVvSQHIWwppTpuc4m5HpZo4u-ckl89X2I6JMOfdn6DTQOk6FJWp9XMfFQhap5SaApkiHD_h39MB-TgxLqgCffdUqeb5dPi_t09Xj3sLhZpSD1PKZS5aAkNUoidUCRoxAFFNI4RG0QsgJLZ1gmATRnkOW5puiMRlpkqLgSU3Kx9Xa-fesxRLupgsO6HlZp-2CNVEayTOuBPP-X5JLLARuVZz_Addv7ZrjCcqaZoVwKutM534bgsbSdrzbgPy2jdvy3FXb8904HFcBO9Yu6_IvaprYrSlv2dR3xI4ovkfOK7Q</recordid><startdate>19840101</startdate><enddate>19840101</enddate><creator>Kaufman, Harold R</creator><creator>Robinson, Raymond S</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19840101</creationdate><title>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</title><author>Kaufman, Harold R ; Robinson, Raymond S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a468t-45ba540754e0ca0e2e33dad47cee67ea9defc7194aa621a9bb60ec76e0d9e5253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>chemical variables control</topic><topic>energy conservation</topic><topic>Orbital maneuvers</topic><topic>propulsion</topic><topic>spacecraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Raymond S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaufman, Harold R</au><au>Robinson, Raymond S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering</atitle><jtitle>Journal of spacecraft and rockets</jtitle><date>1984-01-01</date><risdate>1984</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>180-186</pages><issn>0022-4650</issn><eissn>1533-6794</eissn><abstract>Several electric thrusters are compared to chemical rockets for orbit raising and in-orbit maneuvering applications. For power-intensive payloads and satellites, electric propulsion can show substantial performance advantages over chemical propulsion. The arcjet is promising for near-future applications because of its low power requirements. The electrostatic thruster offers additional performance advantages over the arcjet, but with added power requirements. The performance of the electrostatic thruster can be enhanced considerably if the power processing requirements can be reached.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/3.8631</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4650 |
ispartof | Journal of spacecraft and rockets, 1984-01, Vol.21 (2), p.180-186 |
issn | 0022-4650 1533-6794 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_3_8631 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | chemical variables control energy conservation Orbital maneuvers propulsion spacecraft |
title | Electric thruster performance for orbit raising and maneuvering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T19%3A07%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Electric%20thruster%20performance%20for%20orbit%20raising%20and%20maneuvering&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20spacecraft%20and%20rockets&rft.au=Kaufman,%20Harold%20R&rft.date=1984-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=180-186&rft.issn=0022-4650&rft.eissn=1533-6794&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/3.8631&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E745741966%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2161702430&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |