Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization

Aerodynamic shape and aerostructural design optimizations that maximize the performance at a single flight condition may result in designs with unacceptable off-design performance. While considering multiple flight conditions in the optimization improves the robustness of the designs, there is a nee...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2015-01, Vol.53 (1), p.104-122
Hauptverfasser: Liem, Rhea P, Kenway, Gaetan K. W, Martins, Joaquim R. R. A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 1
container_start_page 104
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 53
creator Liem, Rhea P
Kenway, Gaetan K. W
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A
description Aerodynamic shape and aerostructural design optimizations that maximize the performance at a single flight condition may result in designs with unacceptable off-design performance. While considering multiple flight conditions in the optimization improves the robustness of the designs, there is a need to develop a way of choosing the flight conditions and their relative emphases such that multipoint optimizations reflect the true objective function. In addition, there is a need to consider uncertain missions and flight conditions. To address this, a new strategy to formulate multipoint design optimization problems is developed that can maximize the aircraft performance over a large number of different missions. This new strategy is applied to the high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range twin-aisle aircraft with the objective of minimizing the fuel burn over all the missions it performs in one year. This is accomplished by determining 25 flight conditions and their respective emphases on drag and structural weight that emulate the fuel-burn minimization for over 100,000 missions. The design optimization is based on the computational fluid dynamics of a full aircraft configuration coupled to a detailed finite element model of the wing structure, enabling the simultaneous optimization of wing aerodynamic shape and structural sizing leading to optimal static aeroelastic tailoring. A coupled adjoint method in conjunction with a gradient-based optimizer enable optimization with respect to 311 design variables subject to 152 constraints. Given the high computational cost of the aerostructural analysis, kriging models are used to evaluate the multiple missions. The results show that the multipoint optimized design reduced the total fuel burn by 6.6%, while the single-point optimization reduced it by only 1.7%. This capability to analyze large numbers of flight conditions and missions and to reduce the multimission problem to a multipoint problem could be used with a few modifications to minimize the expected value of any objective function given the probability density functions of the flight conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J052940
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052940</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1651453506</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-af55d0332784c815e4f2e2dc3ba240bd4689cb6cc6e4af414a5522f9fd39c5643</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90UtLAzEQAOAgCtbqwX-wIIgetmby6u6xFuuDll4UvYU0m0DKdrcmWUF_vaktIgqeQphvhnkgdAp4QDiwKxg8YE5KhvdQDzilOS34yz7qYYwhB8bJIToKYZl-ZFhADz3Pujq6lQvBtU02cl57ZWM26UydX3e-yWauSeEPFTfxN6eyr4R165qYjYxvQ_Sdjp1XdTZfx296jA6sqoM52b199DS5eRzf5dP57f14NM0VLVjMleW8wpSmZpgugBtmiSGVpgtFGF5UTBSlXgithWHKMmCKc0JsaStaai4Y7aOLbd21b187E6JMs2hT16oxbRckiLQVTjkWiZ79oss2TZi6k4SVIIgoh_g_BYJhwCTRpC63SqcNBG-sXHu3Uv5dApabQ0iQu0Mke761yin1o9of-AmzfIXZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1640102916</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Liem, Rhea P ; Kenway, Gaetan K. W ; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</creator><creatorcontrib>Liem, Rhea P ; Kenway, Gaetan K. W ; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</creatorcontrib><description>Aerodynamic shape and aerostructural design optimizations that maximize the performance at a single flight condition may result in designs with unacceptable off-design performance. While considering multiple flight conditions in the optimization improves the robustness of the designs, there is a need to develop a way of choosing the flight conditions and their relative emphases such that multipoint optimizations reflect the true objective function. In addition, there is a need to consider uncertain missions and flight conditions. To address this, a new strategy to formulate multipoint design optimization problems is developed that can maximize the aircraft performance over a large number of different missions. This new strategy is applied to the high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range twin-aisle aircraft with the objective of minimizing the fuel burn over all the missions it performs in one year. This is accomplished by determining 25 flight conditions and their respective emphases on drag and structural weight that emulate the fuel-burn minimization for over 100,000 missions. The design optimization is based on the computational fluid dynamics of a full aircraft configuration coupled to a detailed finite element model of the wing structure, enabling the simultaneous optimization of wing aerodynamic shape and structural sizing leading to optimal static aeroelastic tailoring. A coupled adjoint method in conjunction with a gradient-based optimizer enable optimization with respect to 311 design variables subject to 152 constraints. Given the high computational cost of the aerostructural analysis, kriging models are used to evaluate the multiple missions. The results show that the multipoint optimized design reduced the total fuel burn by 6.6%, while the single-point optimization reduced it by only 1.7%. This capability to analyze large numbers of flight conditions and missions and to reduce the multimission problem to a multipoint problem could be used with a few modifications to minimize the expected value of any objective function given the probability density functions of the flight conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J052940</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Aerodynamics ; Aeroelasticity ; Aerospace engineering ; Aircraft ; Aircraft configurations ; Aircraft fuels ; Aircraft performance ; Aviation fuel ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Computing costs ; Cost analysis ; Design engineering ; Design optimization ; Finite element method ; Flight conditions ; Fuels ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Missions ; Optimization ; Probability density functions ; Rockets ; Structural weight ; Wide-body aircraft</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2015-01, Vol.53 (1), p.104-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 by the authors. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-385X/14 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-af55d0332784c815e4f2e2dc3ba240bd4689cb6cc6e4af414a5522f9fd39c5643</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-af55d0332784c815e4f2e2dc3ba240bd4689cb6cc6e4af414a5522f9fd39c5643</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liem, Rhea P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenway, Gaetan K. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</creatorcontrib><title>Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>Aerodynamic shape and aerostructural design optimizations that maximize the performance at a single flight condition may result in designs with unacceptable off-design performance. While considering multiple flight conditions in the optimization improves the robustness of the designs, there is a need to develop a way of choosing the flight conditions and their relative emphases such that multipoint optimizations reflect the true objective function. In addition, there is a need to consider uncertain missions and flight conditions. To address this, a new strategy to formulate multipoint design optimization problems is developed that can maximize the aircraft performance over a large number of different missions. This new strategy is applied to the high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range twin-aisle aircraft with the objective of minimizing the fuel burn over all the missions it performs in one year. This is accomplished by determining 25 flight conditions and their respective emphases on drag and structural weight that emulate the fuel-burn minimization for over 100,000 missions. The design optimization is based on the computational fluid dynamics of a full aircraft configuration coupled to a detailed finite element model of the wing structure, enabling the simultaneous optimization of wing aerodynamic shape and structural sizing leading to optimal static aeroelastic tailoring. A coupled adjoint method in conjunction with a gradient-based optimizer enable optimization with respect to 311 design variables subject to 152 constraints. Given the high computational cost of the aerostructural analysis, kriging models are used to evaluate the multiple missions. The results show that the multipoint optimized design reduced the total fuel burn by 6.6%, while the single-point optimization reduced it by only 1.7%. This capability to analyze large numbers of flight conditions and missions and to reduce the multimission problem to a multipoint problem could be used with a few modifications to minimize the expected value of any objective function given the probability density functions of the flight conditions.</description><subject>Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Aeroelasticity</subject><subject>Aerospace engineering</subject><subject>Aircraft</subject><subject>Aircraft configurations</subject><subject>Aircraft fuels</subject><subject>Aircraft performance</subject><subject>Aviation fuel</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Computing costs</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Flight conditions</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Missions</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Probability density functions</subject><subject>Rockets</subject><subject>Structural weight</subject><subject>Wide-body aircraft</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90UtLAzEQAOAgCtbqwX-wIIgetmby6u6xFuuDll4UvYU0m0DKdrcmWUF_vaktIgqeQphvhnkgdAp4QDiwKxg8YE5KhvdQDzilOS34yz7qYYwhB8bJIToKYZl-ZFhADz3Pujq6lQvBtU02cl57ZWM26UydX3e-yWauSeEPFTfxN6eyr4R165qYjYxvQ_Sdjp1XdTZfx296jA6sqoM52b199DS5eRzf5dP57f14NM0VLVjMleW8wpSmZpgugBtmiSGVpgtFGF5UTBSlXgithWHKMmCKc0JsaStaai4Y7aOLbd21b187E6JMs2hT16oxbRckiLQVTjkWiZ79oss2TZi6k4SVIIgoh_g_BYJhwCTRpC63SqcNBG-sXHu3Uv5dApabQ0iQu0Mke761yin1o9of-AmzfIXZ</recordid><startdate>201501</startdate><enddate>201501</enddate><creator>Liem, Rhea P</creator><creator>Kenway, Gaetan K. W</creator><creator>Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201501</creationdate><title>Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization</title><author>Liem, Rhea P ; Kenway, Gaetan K. W ; Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a384t-af55d0332784c815e4f2e2dc3ba240bd4689cb6cc6e4af414a5522f9fd39c5643</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Aeroelasticity</topic><topic>Aerospace engineering</topic><topic>Aircraft</topic><topic>Aircraft configurations</topic><topic>Aircraft fuels</topic><topic>Aircraft performance</topic><topic>Aviation fuel</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Computing costs</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Flight conditions</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Missions</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Probability density functions</topic><topic>Rockets</topic><topic>Structural weight</topic><topic>Wide-body aircraft</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liem, Rhea P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kenway, Gaetan K. W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liem, Rhea P</au><au>Kenway, Gaetan K. W</au><au>Martins, Joaquim R. R. A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2015-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>104-122</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><abstract>Aerodynamic shape and aerostructural design optimizations that maximize the performance at a single flight condition may result in designs with unacceptable off-design performance. While considering multiple flight conditions in the optimization improves the robustness of the designs, there is a need to develop a way of choosing the flight conditions and their relative emphases such that multipoint optimizations reflect the true objective function. In addition, there is a need to consider uncertain missions and flight conditions. To address this, a new strategy to formulate multipoint design optimization problems is developed that can maximize the aircraft performance over a large number of different missions. This new strategy is applied to the high-fidelity aerostructural optimization of a long-range twin-aisle aircraft with the objective of minimizing the fuel burn over all the missions it performs in one year. This is accomplished by determining 25 flight conditions and their respective emphases on drag and structural weight that emulate the fuel-burn minimization for over 100,000 missions. The design optimization is based on the computational fluid dynamics of a full aircraft configuration coupled to a detailed finite element model of the wing structure, enabling the simultaneous optimization of wing aerodynamic shape and structural sizing leading to optimal static aeroelastic tailoring. A coupled adjoint method in conjunction with a gradient-based optimizer enable optimization with respect to 311 design variables subject to 152 constraints. Given the high computational cost of the aerostructural analysis, kriging models are used to evaluate the multiple missions. The results show that the multipoint optimized design reduced the total fuel burn by 6.6%, while the single-point optimization reduced it by only 1.7%. This capability to analyze large numbers of flight conditions and missions and to reduce the multimission problem to a multipoint problem could be used with a few modifications to minimize the expected value of any objective function given the probability density functions of the flight conditions.</abstract><cop>Virginia</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J052940</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2015-01, Vol.53 (1), p.104-122
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052940
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aerodynamics
Aeroelasticity
Aerospace engineering
Aircraft
Aircraft configurations
Aircraft fuels
Aircraft performance
Aviation fuel
Computational fluid dynamics
Computing costs
Cost analysis
Design engineering
Design optimization
Finite element method
Flight conditions
Fuels
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Missions
Optimization
Probability density functions
Rockets
Structural weight
Wide-body aircraft
title Multimission Aircraft Fuel-Burn Minimization via Multipoint Aerostructural Optimization
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A58%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multimission%20Aircraft%20Fuel-Burn%20Minimization%20via%20Multipoint%20Aerostructural%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Liem,%20Rhea%20P&rft.date=2015-01&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=104-122&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J052940&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E1651453506%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1640102916&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true