Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body

A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:AIAA journal 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446
Hauptverfasser: Wilson, Jacob, Schatzman, David, Arad, Eran, Seifert, Avraham, Shtendel, Tom
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2446
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2432
container_title AIAA journal
container_volume 51
creator Wilson, Jacob
Schatzman, David
Arad, Eran
Seifert, Avraham
Shtendel, Tom
description A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.J052333
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069982901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKcP_gcFUfShM5cfTfe4DTeVgYIKvpU0TSWjbWrSovvvzdgQUfDpyx2f-9xxCJ0CHhEO7BpG95gTSukeGgCnNKYpf91HA4wxxMA4OURH3q9CRUQKA7R46lVnbBPJpoge-8rrIp5W9sM0b9E8ZDSzTedsFU3atjK6iDob0Gjyafy6rnXnjIqmtlgfo4NShumTXQ7Ry_zmeXYbLx8Wd7PJMpaM8S5O8lRjlgqeY0211mkCY8oIiDy0izGWiVClCikUEBmaicQpcCYZJUWSCzpEl1tv6-x7r32X1cYrXVWy0bb3GbBgJ5jxDXr2C13Z3jXhuoywMVCKgeL_KGAUximHBAJ1taWUs947XWatM7V06wxwtnl8Btnu8YE93xmlV7IqnWyU8d8DRIgEBNk4L7acNFL-2PpH-AUjKope</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431985161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J052333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIAJAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Active control ; Actuators ; Aerospace engineering ; Arrays ; Axisymmetric bodies ; Axisymmetric flow ; Blowing ; Computation ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Control systems ; Delay ; Drag ; Drag reduction ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow control ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Optimization ; Physics ; Reynolds number ; Robust control ; Separation ; Suction</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. JSW and DS transfer their rights to the US Gov. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. JSW and DS transfer their rights to the US Gov. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-385X/13 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27761721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arad, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</description><subject>Active control</subject><subject>Actuators</subject><subject>Aerospace engineering</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Axisymmetric bodies</subject><subject>Axisymmetric flow</subject><subject>Blowing</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Drag reduction</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Suction</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKcP_gcFUfShM5cfTfe4DTeVgYIKvpU0TSWjbWrSovvvzdgQUfDpyx2f-9xxCJ0CHhEO7BpG95gTSukeGgCnNKYpf91HA4wxxMA4OURH3q9CRUQKA7R46lVnbBPJpoge-8rrIp5W9sM0b9E8ZDSzTedsFU3atjK6iDob0Gjyafy6rnXnjIqmtlgfo4NShumTXQ7Ry_zmeXYbLx8Wd7PJMpaM8S5O8lRjlgqeY0211mkCY8oIiDy0izGWiVClCikUEBmaicQpcCYZJUWSCzpEl1tv6-x7r32X1cYrXVWy0bb3GbBgJ5jxDXr2C13Z3jXhuoywMVCKgeL_KGAUximHBAJ1taWUs947XWatM7V06wxwtnl8Btnu8YE93xmlV7IqnWyU8d8DRIgEBNk4L7acNFL-2PpH-AUjKope</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Wilson, Jacob</creator><creator>Schatzman, David</creator><creator>Arad, Eran</creator><creator>Seifert, Avraham</creator><creator>Shtendel, Tom</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><author>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Active control</topic><topic>Actuators</topic><topic>Aerospace engineering</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Axisymmetric bodies</topic><topic>Axisymmetric flow</topic><topic>Blowing</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Drag reduction</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Suction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arad, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Jacob</au><au>Schatzman, David</au><au>Arad, Eran</au><au>Seifert, Avraham</au><au>Shtendel, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2432</spage><epage>2446</epage><pages>2432-2446</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><coden>AIAJAH</coden><abstract>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J052333</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-1452
ispartof AIAA journal, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446
issn 0001-1452
1533-385X
language eng
recordid cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052333
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Active control
Actuators
Aerospace engineering
Arrays
Axisymmetric bodies
Axisymmetric flow
Blowing
Computation
Computational fluid dynamics
Control systems
Delay
Drag
Drag reduction
Exact sciences and technology
Flow control
Fluid dynamics
Fluid flow
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Optimization
Physics
Reynolds number
Robust control
Separation
Suction
title Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A14%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suction%20and%20Pulsed-Blowing%20Flow%20Control%20Applied%20to%20an%20Axisymmetric%20Body&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Wilson,%20Jacob&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2432&rft.epage=2446&rft.pages=2432-2446&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft.coden=AIAJAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J052333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E3069982901%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431985161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true