Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body
A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIAA journal 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2446 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 2432 |
container_title | AIAA journal |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Wilson, Jacob Schatzman, David Arad, Eran Seifert, Avraham Shtendel, Tom |
description | A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2514/1.J052333 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052333</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069982901</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKcP_gcFUfShM5cfTfe4DTeVgYIKvpU0TSWjbWrSovvvzdgQUfDpyx2f-9xxCJ0CHhEO7BpG95gTSukeGgCnNKYpf91HA4wxxMA4OURH3q9CRUQKA7R46lVnbBPJpoge-8rrIp5W9sM0b9E8ZDSzTedsFU3atjK6iDob0Gjyafy6rnXnjIqmtlgfo4NShumTXQ7Ry_zmeXYbLx8Wd7PJMpaM8S5O8lRjlgqeY0211mkCY8oIiDy0izGWiVClCikUEBmaicQpcCYZJUWSCzpEl1tv6-x7r32X1cYrXVWy0bb3GbBgJ5jxDXr2C13Z3jXhuoywMVCKgeL_KGAUximHBAJ1taWUs947XWatM7V06wxwtnl8Btnu8YE93xmlV7IqnWyU8d8DRIgEBNk4L7acNFL-2PpH-AUjKope</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1431985161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</creator><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><description>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-1452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-385X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.J052333</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AIAJAH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Active control ; Actuators ; Aerospace engineering ; Arrays ; Axisymmetric bodies ; Axisymmetric flow ; Blowing ; Computation ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Control systems ; Delay ; Drag ; Drag reduction ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flow control ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Optimization ; Physics ; Reynolds number ; Robust control ; Separation ; Suction</subject><ispartof>AIAA journal, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. JSW and DS transfer their rights to the US Gov. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 by the authors. JSW and DS transfer their rights to the US Gov. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. Copies of this paper may be made for personal or internal use, on condition that the copier pay the $10.00 per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923; include the code 1533-385X/13 and $10.00 in correspondence with the CCC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27761721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arad, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><title>AIAA journal</title><description>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</description><subject>Active control</subject><subject>Actuators</subject><subject>Aerospace engineering</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Axisymmetric bodies</subject><subject>Axisymmetric flow</subject><subject>Blowing</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Control systems</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Drag reduction</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flow control</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reynolds number</subject><subject>Robust control</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Suction</subject><issn>0001-1452</issn><issn>1533-385X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN9LwzAQx4MoOKcP_gcFUfShM5cfTfe4DTeVgYIKvpU0TSWjbWrSovvvzdgQUfDpyx2f-9xxCJ0CHhEO7BpG95gTSukeGgCnNKYpf91HA4wxxMA4OURH3q9CRUQKA7R46lVnbBPJpoge-8rrIp5W9sM0b9E8ZDSzTedsFU3atjK6iDob0Gjyafy6rnXnjIqmtlgfo4NShumTXQ7Ry_zmeXYbLx8Wd7PJMpaM8S5O8lRjlgqeY0211mkCY8oIiDy0izGWiVClCikUEBmaicQpcCYZJUWSCzpEl1tv6-x7r32X1cYrXVWy0bb3GbBgJ5jxDXr2C13Z3jXhuoywMVCKgeL_KGAUximHBAJ1taWUs947XWatM7V06wxwtnl8Btnu8YE93xmlV7IqnWyU8d8DRIgEBNk4L7acNFL-2PpH-AUjKope</recordid><startdate>20131001</startdate><enddate>20131001</enddate><creator>Wilson, Jacob</creator><creator>Schatzman, David</creator><creator>Arad, Eran</creator><creator>Seifert, Avraham</creator><creator>Shtendel, Tom</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20131001</creationdate><title>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</title><author>Wilson, Jacob ; Schatzman, David ; Arad, Eran ; Seifert, Avraham ; Shtendel, Tom</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a445t-6b8e04875b0e3eee861934217be04d90a67cfc90a7c12abe06a08154a432d6b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Active control</topic><topic>Actuators</topic><topic>Aerospace engineering</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Axisymmetric bodies</topic><topic>Axisymmetric flow</topic><topic>Blowing</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Control systems</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Drag reduction</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flow control</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reynolds number</topic><topic>Robust control</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Suction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Jacob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schatzman, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arad, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seifert, Avraham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shtendel, Tom</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wilson, Jacob</au><au>Schatzman, David</au><au>Arad, Eran</au><au>Seifert, Avraham</au><au>Shtendel, Tom</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body</atitle><jtitle>AIAA journal</jtitle><date>2013-10-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2432</spage><epage>2446</epage><pages>2432-2446</pages><issn>0001-1452</issn><eissn>1533-385X</eissn><coden>AIAJAH</coden><abstract>A flow-control study using steady suction and pulsed blowing in close proximity was conducted on an axisymmetric bluff body at length-based Reynolds numbers between 1.0 and 4.0×106. The study included a coupled incremental computational-fluid-dynamics and experimental approach. It began with computations of various model setup designs. Subsequently, flow-control experiments and computations were used to optimize steady suction alone. Finally, flow control was provided by a synchronized array of 28 suction and oscillatory blowing actuators, positioned slightly upstream of the baseline separation. Results show suction alone has a limited ability to delay separation and reduce drag on this geometry. Suction located far from the baseline separation is shown to actually increase drag. Addition of pulsed blowing enables separation delay to the trailing edge and drag to be nullified. Increased overall system efficiency, including estimated total actuator power invested, was found at low momentum input for optimally located steady suction and pulsed blowing. This was partially attributed to the particular geometry used because the active flow-control system shows a robust ability to delay separation. Not all measured trends were predicted by computation due to the complex nature of this configuration and the active flow-control system characteristics.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.J052333</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-1452 |
ispartof | AIAA journal, 2013-10, Vol.51 (10), p.2432-2446 |
issn | 0001-1452 1533-385X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_J052333 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Active control Actuators Aerospace engineering Arrays Axisymmetric bodies Axisymmetric flow Blowing Computation Computational fluid dynamics Control systems Delay Drag Drag reduction Exact sciences and technology Flow control Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) Optimization Physics Reynolds number Robust control Separation Suction |
title | Suction and Pulsed-Blowing Flow Control Applied to an Axisymmetric Body |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A14%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Suction%20and%20Pulsed-Blowing%20Flow%20Control%20Applied%20to%20an%20Axisymmetric%20Body&rft.jtitle=AIAA%20journal&rft.au=Wilson,%20Jacob&rft.date=2013-10-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2432&rft.epage=2446&rft.pages=2432-2446&rft.issn=0001-1452&rft.eissn=1533-385X&rft.coden=AIAJAH&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.J052333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E3069982901%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1431985161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |