Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle

A prune-and-search optimization algorithm was combined with a reduced-order model of the scramjet engine within a generic X-51 vehicle. The goal was to maximize the thrust in order to achieve thrust-to-drag ratios that equal or exceed 1, even for the difficult cases of flight at high altitudes and h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of propulsion and power 2024-11, Vol.40 (6), p.905-915
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Yunseok, Driscoll, James F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 915
container_issue 6
container_start_page 905
container_title Journal of propulsion and power
container_volume 40
creator Choi, Yunseok
Driscoll, James F.
description A prune-and-search optimization algorithm was combined with a reduced-order model of the scramjet engine within a generic X-51 vehicle. The goal was to maximize the thrust in order to achieve thrust-to-drag ratios that equal or exceed 1, even for the difficult cases of flight at high altitudes and high Mach numbers up to 10. For the inlet to the engine, the lengths and inclination angles of three wall panels were varied. For the combustor, three parameters were varied: the diameter and number of fuel injector ports and the wall divergence angle. These variables affect both the combustion efficiency and the finite-rate chemistry of the surrogate JP-7 fuel. The optimization algorithm showed that at higher flight Mach numbers an inlet that maximizes static pressure ratio is preferred over one that maximizes the stagnation pressure ratio, because good combustion efficiency requires a sufficient static pressure in the combustor. As the flight Mach number is increased, thrust decreases while the drag increases. Thus, it becomes difficult to achieve thrust that exceeds drag. A solution is shown to be increasing the engine inlet area above a critical value that was computed. Advantages of a reduced-order model over a high-fidelity CFD approach are discussed when thousands of computations of all components within an entire engine are required for optimization.
doi_str_mv 10.2514/1.B39553
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_aiaa_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_B39553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3125547294</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1f731561e1f0f135015b5fcae16d4ce62eabab9b27f4fa5dba14f0f90bd8ee8b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpl0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8CcERPCSupP9SvCkRVuh0EsVb8tuMku3tEncTQ_trzclggdPMwMP78BLyC3QSSaAP8LkhRVCsDMyAsFYynIlz8mIKp6nXIr8klzFuKEUZC7ViDwt287v_NF0vqmTxiWrddjH7rSZZIY1Bl8mX6mAZH5oMcSm7u9PXPtyi9fkwpltxJvfOSYfb6-r6TxdLGfv0-dFakDJLgWnGAgJCI46YIKCsMKVBkFWvESZobHGFjZTjjsjKmuA97KgtsoRc8vG5G7IbUPzvcfY6U2zD3X_UjPIhOAqK3ivHgZVhibGgE63we9MOGig-lSNBj1U09P7gRpvzF_YP_cDf5tgOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3125547294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Choi, Yunseok ; Driscoll, James F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok ; Driscoll, James F.</creatorcontrib><description>A prune-and-search optimization algorithm was combined with a reduced-order model of the scramjet engine within a generic X-51 vehicle. The goal was to maximize the thrust in order to achieve thrust-to-drag ratios that equal or exceed 1, even for the difficult cases of flight at high altitudes and high Mach numbers up to 10. For the inlet to the engine, the lengths and inclination angles of three wall panels were varied. For the combustor, three parameters were varied: the diameter and number of fuel injector ports and the wall divergence angle. These variables affect both the combustion efficiency and the finite-rate chemistry of the surrogate JP-7 fuel. The optimization algorithm showed that at higher flight Mach numbers an inlet that maximizes static pressure ratio is preferred over one that maximizes the stagnation pressure ratio, because good combustion efficiency requires a sufficient static pressure in the combustor. As the flight Mach number is increased, thrust decreases while the drag increases. Thus, it becomes difficult to achieve thrust that exceeds drag. A solution is shown to be increasing the engine inlet area above a critical value that was computed. Advantages of a reduced-order model over a high-fidelity CFD approach are discussed when thousands of computations of all components within an entire engine are required for optimization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-4658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-3876</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2514/1.B39553</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Combustion chambers ; Combustion efficiency ; Drag ; Engine inlets ; Flight ; Fuel injection ; High altitude ; High Mach number ; Hypersonic vehicles ; Inclination angle ; Mathematical models ; Optimization ; Optimization algorithms ; Pressure ratio ; Reduced order models ; Stagnation pressure ; Static pressure ; Supersonic aircraft ; Supersonic combustion ramjet engines ; Thrust</subject><ispartof>Journal of propulsion and power, 2024-11, Vol.40 (6), p.905-915</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by Yunseok Choi. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at ; employ the eISSN to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions .</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 by Yunseok Choi. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3876 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1f731561e1f0f135015b5fcae16d4ce62eabab9b27f4fa5dba14f0f90bd8ee8b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5490-1643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, James F.</creatorcontrib><title>Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle</title><title>Journal of propulsion and power</title><description>A prune-and-search optimization algorithm was combined with a reduced-order model of the scramjet engine within a generic X-51 vehicle. The goal was to maximize the thrust in order to achieve thrust-to-drag ratios that equal or exceed 1, even for the difficult cases of flight at high altitudes and high Mach numbers up to 10. For the inlet to the engine, the lengths and inclination angles of three wall panels were varied. For the combustor, three parameters were varied: the diameter and number of fuel injector ports and the wall divergence angle. These variables affect both the combustion efficiency and the finite-rate chemistry of the surrogate JP-7 fuel. The optimization algorithm showed that at higher flight Mach numbers an inlet that maximizes static pressure ratio is preferred over one that maximizes the stagnation pressure ratio, because good combustion efficiency requires a sufficient static pressure in the combustor. As the flight Mach number is increased, thrust decreases while the drag increases. Thus, it becomes difficult to achieve thrust that exceeds drag. A solution is shown to be increasing the engine inlet area above a critical value that was computed. Advantages of a reduced-order model over a high-fidelity CFD approach are discussed when thousands of computations of all components within an entire engine are required for optimization.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Combustion chambers</subject><subject>Combustion efficiency</subject><subject>Drag</subject><subject>Engine inlets</subject><subject>Flight</subject><subject>Fuel injection</subject><subject>High altitude</subject><subject>High Mach number</subject><subject>Hypersonic vehicles</subject><subject>Inclination angle</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization algorithms</subject><subject>Pressure ratio</subject><subject>Reduced order models</subject><subject>Stagnation pressure</subject><subject>Static pressure</subject><subject>Supersonic aircraft</subject><subject>Supersonic combustion ramjet engines</subject><subject>Thrust</subject><issn>0748-4658</issn><issn>1533-3876</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpl0E1Lw0AQBuBFFKxV8CcERPCSupP9SvCkRVuh0EsVb8tuMku3tEncTQ_trzclggdPMwMP78BLyC3QSSaAP8LkhRVCsDMyAsFYynIlz8mIKp6nXIr8klzFuKEUZC7ViDwt287v_NF0vqmTxiWrddjH7rSZZIY1Bl8mX6mAZH5oMcSm7u9PXPtyi9fkwpltxJvfOSYfb6-r6TxdLGfv0-dFakDJLgWnGAgJCI46YIKCsMKVBkFWvESZobHGFjZTjjsjKmuA97KgtsoRc8vG5G7IbUPzvcfY6U2zD3X_UjPIhOAqK3ivHgZVhibGgE63we9MOGig-lSNBj1U09P7gRpvzF_YP_cDf5tgOw</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Choi, Yunseok</creator><creator>Driscoll, James F.</creator><general>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-1643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle</title><author>Choi, Yunseok ; Driscoll, James F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a176t-1f731561e1f0f135015b5fcae16d4ce62eabab9b27f4fa5dba14f0f90bd8ee8b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Combustion chambers</topic><topic>Combustion efficiency</topic><topic>Drag</topic><topic>Engine inlets</topic><topic>Flight</topic><topic>Fuel injection</topic><topic>High altitude</topic><topic>High Mach number</topic><topic>Hypersonic vehicles</topic><topic>Inclination angle</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization algorithms</topic><topic>Pressure ratio</topic><topic>Reduced order models</topic><topic>Stagnation pressure</topic><topic>Static pressure</topic><topic>Supersonic aircraft</topic><topic>Supersonic combustion ramjet engines</topic><topic>Thrust</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yunseok</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Driscoll, James F.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Yunseok</au><au>Driscoll, James F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle</atitle><jtitle>Journal of propulsion and power</jtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>905</spage><epage>915</epage><pages>905-915</pages><issn>0748-4658</issn><eissn>1533-3876</eissn><abstract>A prune-and-search optimization algorithm was combined with a reduced-order model of the scramjet engine within a generic X-51 vehicle. The goal was to maximize the thrust in order to achieve thrust-to-drag ratios that equal or exceed 1, even for the difficult cases of flight at high altitudes and high Mach numbers up to 10. For the inlet to the engine, the lengths and inclination angles of three wall panels were varied. For the combustor, three parameters were varied: the diameter and number of fuel injector ports and the wall divergence angle. These variables affect both the combustion efficiency and the finite-rate chemistry of the surrogate JP-7 fuel. The optimization algorithm showed that at higher flight Mach numbers an inlet that maximizes static pressure ratio is preferred over one that maximizes the stagnation pressure ratio, because good combustion efficiency requires a sufficient static pressure in the combustor. As the flight Mach number is increased, thrust decreases while the drag increases. Thus, it becomes difficult to achieve thrust that exceeds drag. A solution is shown to be increasing the engine inlet area above a critical value that was computed. Advantages of a reduced-order model over a high-fidelity CFD approach are discussed when thousands of computations of all components within an entire engine are required for optimization.</abstract><cop>Reston</cop><pub>American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics</pub><doi>10.2514/1.B39553</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5490-1643</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-4658
ispartof Journal of propulsion and power, 2024-11, Vol.40 (6), p.905-915
issn 0748-4658
1533-3876
language eng
recordid cdi_aiaa_journals_10_2514_1_B39553
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Algorithms
Combustion chambers
Combustion efficiency
Drag
Engine inlets
Flight
Fuel injection
High altitude
High Mach number
Hypersonic vehicles
Inclination angle
Mathematical models
Optimization
Optimization algorithms
Pressure ratio
Reduced order models
Stagnation pressure
Static pressure
Supersonic aircraft
Supersonic combustion ramjet engines
Thrust
title Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A41%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_aiaa_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimization%20of%20Thrust%20of%20a%20Generic%20X-51%20Hypersonic%20Vehicle&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20propulsion%20and%20power&rft.au=Choi,%20Yunseok&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=905&rft.epage=915&rft.pages=905-915&rft.issn=0748-4658&rft.eissn=1533-3876&rft_id=info:doi/10.2514/1.B39553&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_aiaa_%3E3125547294%3C/proquest_aiaa_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3125547294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true