Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models

System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Brin...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Tako, Antuela A., Robinson, Stewart
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2377
container_issue
container_start_page 2377
container_title
container_volume
creator Tako, Antuela A.
Robinson, Stewart
description System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Bringing the end user into the picture can give interesting insights about how differently users perceive DES and SD simulation models. This paper provides an empirical study on the comparison of the two simulation approaches in terms of model use. We used a questionnaire survey with executive MBA students in order to assess how different users find the two simulation approaches in terms of understanding, complexity, model validity, model usefulness and model results. Our results suggest that model users do not perceive any significant differences between a DES and SD model.
doi_str_mv 10.5555/1351542.1351977
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acm</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_acm_books_10_5555_1351542_1351977</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>acm_books_10_5555_1351542_1351977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-acm_books_10_5555_1351542_13519773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjrFuwjAUAC0hpKKSmfWNXQh-OCHJHLWCnd1ykhdwie0qz1Ti7wEpHwC33HLDCbFCmeYPNqhyzLNt-nRVFDORVEWJ2TbLUMld_iES5l8pJaIqscKFONTB_ZnR-hPEM8GVCUIPneV2pEhr-icfga27Diba4MH4DvjGkRx0N2-cbRlc6GjgpZj3ZmBKJn-Kr5_vY71fm9bpJoQLa5T6eamnSz1dqrfS9MVUN6OlXt0BIHtPDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Tako, Antuela A. ; Robinson, Stewart</creator><creatorcontrib>Tako, Antuela A. ; Robinson, Stewart</creatorcontrib><description>System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Bringing the end user into the picture can give interesting insights about how differently users perceive DES and SD simulation models. This paper provides an empirical study on the comparison of the two simulation approaches in terms of model use. We used a questionnaire survey with executive MBA students in order to assess how different users find the two simulation approaches in terms of understanding, complexity, model validity, model usefulness and model results. Our results suggest that model users do not perceive any significant differences between a DES and SD model.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9781424413065</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1424413060</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5555/1351542.1351977</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway, NJ, USA: IEEE Press</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come, 2007, p.2377-2377</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tako, Antuela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stewart</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models</title><title>Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come</title><description>System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Bringing the end user into the picture can give interesting insights about how differently users perceive DES and SD simulation models. This paper provides an empirical study on the comparison of the two simulation approaches in terms of model use. We used a questionnaire survey with executive MBA students in order to assess how different users find the two simulation approaches in terms of understanding, complexity, model validity, model usefulness and model results. Our results suggest that model users do not perceive any significant differences between a DES and SD model.</description><isbn>9781424413065</isbn><isbn>1424413060</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVjrFuwjAUAC0hpKKSmfWNXQh-OCHJHLWCnd1ykhdwie0qz1Ti7wEpHwC33HLDCbFCmeYPNqhyzLNt-nRVFDORVEWJ2TbLUMld_iES5l8pJaIqscKFONTB_ZnR-hPEM8GVCUIPneV2pEhr-icfga27Diba4MH4DvjGkRx0N2-cbRlc6GjgpZj3ZmBKJn-Kr5_vY71fm9bpJoQLa5T6eamnSz1dqrfS9MVUN6OlXt0BIHtPDQ</recordid><startdate>20071209</startdate><enddate>20071209</enddate><creator>Tako, Antuela A.</creator><creator>Robinson, Stewart</creator><general>IEEE Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20071209</creationdate><title>Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models</title><author>Tako, Antuela A. ; Robinson, Stewart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-acm_books_10_5555_1351542_13519773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tako, Antuela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Stewart</creatorcontrib></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tako, Antuela A.</au><au>Robinson, Stewart</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come</btitle><date>2007-12-09</date><risdate>2007</risdate><spage>2377</spage><epage>2377</epage><pages>2377-2377</pages><isbn>9781424413065</isbn><isbn>1424413060</isbn><abstract>System Dynamics (SD) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) are two simulation techniques widely used in Operational Research. Existing literature on how these approaches compare is scarce. The few comparative studies found in the literature are mostly based on the authors' personal opinions. Bringing the end user into the picture can give interesting insights about how differently users perceive DES and SD simulation models. This paper provides an empirical study on the comparison of the two simulation approaches in terms of model use. We used a questionnaire survey with executive MBA students in order to assess how different users find the two simulation approaches in terms of understanding, complexity, model validity, model usefulness and model results. Our results suggest that model users do not perceive any significant differences between a DES and SD model.</abstract><cop>Piscataway, NJ, USA</cop><pub>IEEE Press</pub><doi>10.5555/1351542.1351977</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISBN: 9781424413065
ispartof Proceedings of the 39th conference on Winter simulation: 40 years! The best is yet to come, 2007, p.2377-2377
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_acm_books_10_5555_1351542_1351977
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
title Comparing the use of discrete-event simulation and system dynamics models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T09%3A28%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acm&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparing%20the%20use%20of%20discrete-event%20simulation%20and%20system%20dynamics%20models&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2039th%20conference%20on%20Winter%20simulation:%2040%20years!%20The%20best%20is%20yet%20to%20come&rft.au=Tako,%20Antuela%20A.&rft.date=2007-12-09&rft.spage=2377&rft.epage=2377&rft.pages=2377-2377&rft.isbn=9781424413065&rft.isbn_list=1424413060&rft_id=info:doi/10.5555/1351542.1351977&rft_dat=%3Cacm%3Eacm_books_10_5555_1351542_1351977%3C/acm%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true