Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures

It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Result...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Keith S., Schmidlin, Elizabeth A., Johnson, Brian R.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 250
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title
container_volume
creator Jones, Keith S.
Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.
Johnson, Brian R.
description It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.
doi_str_mv 10.1145/1514095.1514160
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acm_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6256048</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a162t-53db90a1882e9bc4bc53bfafb252ab9b81a82dd98be0ee2457c2ab0b16bc25b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtvAjEQhJ2XFEKoU6RxlzRHvD778JURIg8JKQ2pLftuD0wgRraJxL_HCBSlzBY70nyzWwwhd8CGAEI-gQTBajk8KFTsjNzkLaUSTMhz0uNQjQoOQl38BZe_gMM1GcS4ZHlGCnKkRyYzXGHhNxhM8iE-0OW2na_xO0XqO5oW6AI11q1c2tHkaRvcD2Y7-O18QU0-S9uA8ZZcdWYVcXDSPvl8mczGb8X04_V9_DwtDFQ8FbJsbc0MKMWxto2wjSxtZzrLJTe2tgqM4m1bK4sMkQs5arLPLFS24dLKsk_uj38dIupNcGsTdrrismJCZfp4pKZZa-v9V9TA9KE5fWpOn5rL0eE_o9oGh125B6JLaGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-2121</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1605584045</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781605584041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-2148</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1605584045</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781605584041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/1514095.1514160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY, USA: ACM</publisher><subject>Affordance ; Aperture ; Apertures ; Cameras ; Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics ; Educational institutions ; Human factors ; Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI) ; Human-Robot Interaction ; Psychology ; Robots ; Tele-operation ; Testing</subject><ispartof>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009, p.249-250</ispartof><rights>2009 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6256048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6256048$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><title>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)</title><addtitle>HRI</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</description><subject>Affordance</subject><subject>Aperture</subject><subject>Apertures</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI)</subject><subject>Human-Robot Interaction</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Tele-operation</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>2167-2121</issn><issn>2167-2148</issn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDtvAjEQhJ2XFEKoU6RxlzRHvD778JURIg8JKQ2pLftuD0wgRraJxL_HCBSlzBY70nyzWwwhd8CGAEI-gQTBajk8KFTsjNzkLaUSTMhz0uNQjQoOQl38BZe_gMM1GcS4ZHlGCnKkRyYzXGHhNxhM8iE-0OW2na_xO0XqO5oW6AI11q1c2tHkaRvcD2Y7-O18QU0-S9uA8ZZcdWYVcXDSPvl8mczGb8X04_V9_DwtDFQ8FbJsbc0MKMWxto2wjSxtZzrLJTe2tgqM4m1bK4sMkQs5arLPLFS24dLKsk_uj38dIupNcGsTdrrismJCZfp4pKZZa-v9V9TA9KE5fWpOn5rL0eE_o9oGh125B6JLaGg</recordid><startdate>20090309</startdate><enddate>20090309</enddate><creator>Jones, Keith S.</creator><creator>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Brian R.</creator><general>ACM</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090309</creationdate><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><author>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a162t-53db90a1882e9bc4bc53bfafb252ab9b81a82dd98be0ee2457c2ab0b16bc25b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affordance</topic><topic>Aperture</topic><topic>Apertures</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI)</topic><topic>Human-Robot Interaction</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Tele-operation</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Keith S.</au><au>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Johnson, Brian R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</atitle><btitle>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)</btitle><stitle>HRI</stitle><date>2009-03-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>249</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>249-250</pages><issn>2167-2121</issn><eissn>2167-2148</eissn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><eisbn>1605584045</eisbn><eisbn>9781605584041</eisbn><abstract>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</abstract><cop>New York, NY, USA</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/1514095.1514160</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2167-2121
ispartof 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009, p.249-250
issn 2167-2121
2167-2148
language eng
recordid cdi_acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Affordance
Aperture
Apertures
Cameras
Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics
Educational institutions
Human factors
Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI)
Human-Robot Interaction
Psychology
Robots
Tele-operation
Testing
title Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acm_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Tele-operators'%20judgments%20of%20their%20ability%20to%20drive%20through%20apertures&rft.btitle=2009%204th%20ACM/IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Human-Robot%20Interaction%20(HRI)&rft.au=Jones,%20Keith%20S.&rft.date=2009-03-09&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=249-250&rft.issn=2167-2121&rft.eissn=2167-2148&rft.isbn=1605584045&rft.isbn_list=9781605584041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/1514095.1514160&rft_dat=%3Cacm_6IE%3Eacm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160%3C/acm_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1605584045&rft.eisbn_list=9781605584041&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6256048&rfr_iscdi=true