Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures
It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Result...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 250 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Jones, Keith S. Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. Johnson, Brian R. |
description | It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1145/1514095.1514160 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>acm_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>6256048</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a162t-53db90a1882e9bc4bc53bfafb252ab9b81a82dd98be0ee2457c2ab0b16bc25b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkDtvAjEQhJ2XFEKoU6RxlzRHvD778JURIg8JKQ2pLftuD0wgRraJxL_HCBSlzBY70nyzWwwhd8CGAEI-gQTBajk8KFTsjNzkLaUSTMhz0uNQjQoOQl38BZe_gMM1GcS4ZHlGCnKkRyYzXGHhNxhM8iE-0OW2na_xO0XqO5oW6AI11q1c2tHkaRvcD2Y7-O18QU0-S9uA8ZZcdWYVcXDSPvl8mczGb8X04_V9_DwtDFQ8FbJsbc0MKMWxto2wjSxtZzrLJTe2tgqM4m1bK4sMkQs5arLPLFS24dLKsk_uj38dIupNcGsTdrrismJCZfp4pKZZa-v9V9TA9KE5fWpOn5rL0eE_o9oGh125B6JLaGg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><description>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-2121</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1605584045</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781605584041</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-2148</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 1605584045</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9781605584041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1145/1514095.1514160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY, USA: ACM</publisher><subject>Affordance ; Aperture ; Apertures ; Cameras ; Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics ; Educational institutions ; Human factors ; Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI) ; Human-Robot Interaction ; Psychology ; Robots ; Tele-operation ; Testing</subject><ispartof>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009, p.249-250</ispartof><rights>2009 Copyright is held by the author/owner(s)</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6256048$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6256048$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><title>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)</title><addtitle>HRI</addtitle><description>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</description><subject>Affordance</subject><subject>Aperture</subject><subject>Apertures</subject><subject>Cameras</subject><subject>Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics</subject><subject>Educational institutions</subject><subject>Human factors</subject><subject>Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI)</subject><subject>Human-Robot Interaction</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Tele-operation</subject><subject>Testing</subject><issn>2167-2121</issn><issn>2167-2148</issn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkDtvAjEQhJ2XFEKoU6RxlzRHvD778JURIg8JKQ2pLftuD0wgRraJxL_HCBSlzBY70nyzWwwhd8CGAEI-gQTBajk8KFTsjNzkLaUSTMhz0uNQjQoOQl38BZe_gMM1GcS4ZHlGCnKkRyYzXGHhNxhM8iE-0OW2na_xO0XqO5oW6AI11q1c2tHkaRvcD2Y7-O18QU0-S9uA8ZZcdWYVcXDSPvl8mczGb8X04_V9_DwtDFQ8FbJsbc0MKMWxto2wjSxtZzrLJTe2tgqM4m1bK4sMkQs5arLPLFS24dLKsk_uj38dIupNcGsTdrrismJCZfp4pKZZa-v9V9TA9KE5fWpOn5rL0eE_o9oGh125B6JLaGg</recordid><startdate>20090309</startdate><enddate>20090309</enddate><creator>Jones, Keith S.</creator><creator>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>Johnson, Brian R.</creator><general>ACM</general><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IL</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090309</creationdate><title>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</title><author>Jones, Keith S. ; Schmidlin, Elizabeth A. ; Johnson, Brian R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a162t-53db90a1882e9bc4bc53bfafb252ab9b81a82dd98be0ee2457c2ab0b16bc25b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Affordance</topic><topic>Aperture</topic><topic>Apertures</topic><topic>Cameras</topic><topic>Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics</topic><topic>Educational institutions</topic><topic>Human factors</topic><topic>Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI)</topic><topic>Human-Robot Interaction</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Tele-operation</topic><topic>Testing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Keith S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Brian R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan All Online (POP All Online) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP All) 1998-Present</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Keith S.</au><au>Schmidlin, Elizabeth A.</au><au>Johnson, Brian R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures</atitle><btitle>2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)</btitle><stitle>HRI</stitle><date>2009-03-09</date><risdate>2009</risdate><spage>249</spage><epage>250</epage><pages>249-250</pages><issn>2167-2121</issn><eissn>2167-2148</eissn><isbn>1605584045</isbn><isbn>9781605584041</isbn><eisbn>1605584045</eisbn><eisbn>9781605584041</eisbn><abstract>It has been suggested that operators should base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control the robot, rather than its static dimensions. Doing so, however, assumes that operators know whether they can drive a robot through the aperture. The present study tested that assumption. Results indicated that judgments about control of the robot were not accurate. In contrast, judgments of static dimensions were accurate. Thus, operators will require support if they must base decisions to enter apertures on their ability to control that robot.</abstract><cop>New York, NY, USA</cop><pub>ACM</pub><doi>10.1145/1514095.1514160</doi><tpages>2</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-2121 |
ispartof | 2009 4th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2009, p.249-250 |
issn | 2167-2121 2167-2148 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_acm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160 |
source | IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings |
subjects | Affordance Aperture Apertures Cameras Computer systems organization -- Embedded and cyber-physical systems -- Robotics -- External interfaces for robotics Educational institutions Human factors Human-centered computing -- Human computer interaction (HCI) Human-Robot Interaction Psychology Robots Tele-operation Testing |
title | Tele-operators' judgments of their ability to drive through apertures |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A40%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acm_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Tele-operators'%20judgments%20of%20their%20ability%20to%20drive%20through%20apertures&rft.btitle=2009%204th%20ACM/IEEE%20International%20Conference%20on%20Human-Robot%20Interaction%20(HRI)&rft.au=Jones,%20Keith%20S.&rft.date=2009-03-09&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=250&rft.pages=249-250&rft.issn=2167-2121&rft.eissn=2167-2148&rft.isbn=1605584045&rft.isbn_list=9781605584041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1145/1514095.1514160&rft_dat=%3Cacm_6IE%3Eacm_books_10_1145_1514095_1514160%3C/acm_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=1605584045&rft.eisbn_list=9781605584041&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=6256048&rfr_iscdi=true |